Testing for York Copies (Brass Herald article)
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:44 pm
Hello Troops,
Gene Pokorny here. I occasionally get myself over to tubenet and ITEA-on-line to see what some of the latest interest is in tubadom. It provides some interesting reading and also an interesting diversion when I should be spending time practicing long tones (and I get to read what other people write… when they should be spending time practicing long tones). Anyway, I feel like responding to an article written by Steve Marcus that has been recently printed in Philip Biggs’ outstanding periodical, “The Brass Herald.”
The main point of this letter is to affirm that I support the efforts that many companies now spend on developing new instruments, including efforts in copying the essential “stuff” of the York tubas that the Chicago Symphony owns. Both of those instruments are unique in their sound to this day. There have been valiant attempts at copying that sound and some manufacturers have come eerily close in those efforts. The fact is that the sound of the CSO York tubas are still unique.
I am the zookeeper for the York tubas and my chosen professional responsibility is to expose these instruments and have them tested against other copies whenever requested. I have done this numerous times over nearly three decades. Big Mouth Brass, Eastman, Hirsbrunner, Kanstul, Nirschl, St. Petersburg, Wessex, Yamaha, etc., etc., have come to Orchestra Hall, to sites at Ravinia and tests in Tokyo, Redlands, Luzern (Switzerland), and other places to do tests. Some of those tests are requested to be private. Some are public. No matter. If this will help out an end product, I am all for it.
Is it a cop-out for me to not say which instrument is closest to the York? Maybe. But I am truly conflicted as I tend to not part with any instruments. There are aspects of all of them that are commendable. Bedrooms in my house abound with instruments.
In fact, an attempted robbery at our house several years ago was abandoned once the robbers saw the multitude of tuba cases in the basement. Their cursory glance probably thought those cases were coffins. The robbers thought they had broken into John Wayne Gacy’s other home!! They ran.
Admittedly, I have a wonderful job in one of the finest orchestras on the planet. I have two beautiful instruments that I have the privilege of playing anytime I want and copies of those instruments many of which I have paid for myself. As long as there are manufacturers with a “sixth sense” that can capture the essence of the York sound, they are more than welcome to ask me to set up a test. I will do what I can do.
Cheers, Gene (AKA Northern)
Gene Pokorny here. I occasionally get myself over to tubenet and ITEA-on-line to see what some of the latest interest is in tubadom. It provides some interesting reading and also an interesting diversion when I should be spending time practicing long tones (and I get to read what other people write… when they should be spending time practicing long tones). Anyway, I feel like responding to an article written by Steve Marcus that has been recently printed in Philip Biggs’ outstanding periodical, “The Brass Herald.”
The main point of this letter is to affirm that I support the efforts that many companies now spend on developing new instruments, including efforts in copying the essential “stuff” of the York tubas that the Chicago Symphony owns. Both of those instruments are unique in their sound to this day. There have been valiant attempts at copying that sound and some manufacturers have come eerily close in those efforts. The fact is that the sound of the CSO York tubas are still unique.
I am the zookeeper for the York tubas and my chosen professional responsibility is to expose these instruments and have them tested against other copies whenever requested. I have done this numerous times over nearly three decades. Big Mouth Brass, Eastman, Hirsbrunner, Kanstul, Nirschl, St. Petersburg, Wessex, Yamaha, etc., etc., have come to Orchestra Hall, to sites at Ravinia and tests in Tokyo, Redlands, Luzern (Switzerland), and other places to do tests. Some of those tests are requested to be private. Some are public. No matter. If this will help out an end product, I am all for it.
Is it a cop-out for me to not say which instrument is closest to the York? Maybe. But I am truly conflicted as I tend to not part with any instruments. There are aspects of all of them that are commendable. Bedrooms in my house abound with instruments.
In fact, an attempted robbery at our house several years ago was abandoned once the robbers saw the multitude of tuba cases in the basement. Their cursory glance probably thought those cases were coffins. The robbers thought they had broken into John Wayne Gacy’s other home!! They ran.
Admittedly, I have a wonderful job in one of the finest orchestras on the planet. I have two beautiful instruments that I have the privilege of playing anytime I want and copies of those instruments many of which I have paid for myself. As long as there are manufacturers with a “sixth sense” that can capture the essence of the York sound, they are more than welcome to ask me to set up a test. I will do what I can do.
Cheers, Gene (AKA Northern)
