Page 1 of 1

Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:29 pm
by timayer
It is a release.

Thoughts?

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:41 pm
by Voisi1ev
timayer wrote:It is a release.

Thoughts?
Good stuff. Might use that with the kiddos tomorrow.

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:42 pm
by gwwilk
Here is one expert opinion.

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:27 pm
by windshieldbug
gwwilk wrote:Here is one expert opinion.

You just like the definition that includes joints... :P

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:09 pm
by gwwilk
windshieldbug wrote:
gwwilk wrote:Here is one expert opinion.

You just like the definition that includes joints... :P
Been in a few, worked on a few, and that's all you need to know.

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:16 pm
by DonShirer
According to the Harvard Dictionary of Music:

"Articulation. A term used to denote (or demand) clarity and distinct rendition in musical performance, whether vocal or instrumental. Correct breathing, phrasing, attack, legato, and staccato are some of the aspects inolved."

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:28 pm
by Bill Troiano
Something I've recently realized, is that it's difficult to simulate legato tonguing. I've had many students over the years who were able to simulate staccato, marcato style articulation. Of course, it's never very good and you can't do it well at brisk tempos. I'm talking about articulating using breath attacks, glottis (?), or a "p" articulation. It's pretty easy to detect, but not too easy to correct when someone has been doing that for years. And, then you factor in that they might be working on region band etudes or solo festival pieces, and it's difficult to address that particular issue at that time.

I recently started doing this exercise myself and I don't really know why, but I found it helpful with students. I'll set a metronome somewhere between 60 and 72. Speed is not a factor, at this point. Start on 2nd space C for CC tubas, or Bb for BBb tubas. Play the whole note for 4 counts and then subdivide it into 16th notes as smoothly as possible, just allowing the tongue to repeatedly place a dent in the whole note playing 16, 16th notes. With myself, I found that with legato tonguing, there's no way to fake it. The tongue is either working, or it's not. And, it won't work properly without the air behind it. And, for me, it won't work right if my embouchure is too tense. So, I go to this exercise sometimes, mostly without a metronome ( I use the met. with students) to check:
tongue function - check;
air function - check;
embouchure tension - check. From there with students, I usually move on to flow study type exercises after that.

I don't know if this makes sense to anyone, or it's like a duh-uh post. It's served as a check for myself. It's helped me get students to articulate more cleanly. I've even had a few students for whom it was a major revelation, that this is how the tongue functions.

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2018 1:07 am
by jperry1466
bloke wrote:"Staccato" is an instruction for string players to make shortened and detached sounds "on the string".
It is the job of wind players to imitate the type of sound made when string players employ that technique.
^^This.^^

I heard Willliam Ravelli say it almost exactly that way, and I taught it that way. I had students draw an imaginary bow across their imaginary violins to show them how strings could not play it as "tut". To make it clearer, I told them to say the word "tone" over and over with a space between, and that became our staccato standard, because a too-short staccato tends to not have any tone to it. Of course, here in Texas, "tone" can be almost a two-syllable word, so maybe our staccato is just a bit longer than most. :D
:tuba:

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:51 am
by timayer
I'll give my thoughts at this point.

It's more of a conceptual issue for me, rather than a definitional one. Staccato is generally described as an articulation. Legato - tenuto - staccato - etc...However "articulation" is generally used to describe how you start a note.

Staccato notes are to be short(er) and detached. There are two ways to detach notes from each other: (1) Start the second note later; or (2) End the first note sooner. Unless you want to slow down every time you encounter staccato sections of music, you have to use option 2.

If you think about staccato as an articulation (i.e., how you start the note) but then execute option 2 above, you are more likely to try to stop the note as you start it, because you are trying to articulate it with separation from the next note. That results in a pecky, toneless staccato. If you think about the staccato as a release, you allow yourself to start the note and then stop it, you allow yourself mentally to create a tone before it stops.

Maybe this is only interesting to me, and it's only interesting as a mental exercise. But I think it can help produce a better and more consistent staccato style for wind players.

Per bloke's point about it being a string instruction, my thoughts came after watching this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1w5KdUxteg" target="_blank

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2018 4:06 pm
by paulver
Definition that I was taught........ "detached". The length of staccato notes is directly related to the type of note(s) being played........ i. e......... quarter note, eighth note, sixteenth note, etc., tempo, phrase location within the piece, any other articulation markings above/below it, and the style of the music being played. My piano prof was a huge PIA about this! He constantly said that staccato notes have a definite length, determined by ALL of the aforementioned. Talk about a purist!!!!!!!

I ultimately went with the "feel" of the music, then, did whatever he said to do if he wasn't pleased with the way I was playing them.

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 1:19 pm
by swillafew
My old yellow dictionary (1936) says: detached, cut off, separated.

Not a word about who is imitating who, or that any instrument or voice owns doing this, or anything more at all.

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:50 pm
by TheGoyWonder
Every note starts the same way. Only the duration and taper vary. (and pitch and amplitude obviously)

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2018 8:47 pm
by tuneitup
In electronic music, the word articulation refers to the shape of sound, ADSR-- Attack, Decay, Sustain, and Release. Even a sound of motorcycle passing by from the beginning of the sound to the moment of silence is considered as an articulation.

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2018 10:50 pm
by Cdub
I've thought of staccato as separated most of my life. It helps me when comparing small value notes of differing lengths with staccato markings on all of them.

A quarter note staccato isn’t the same as an eighth note staccato (providing tempo and meter are constant).

Those are my 2 cents. :)

Re: Staccato is not an articulation

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2018 6:59 am
by Alex C
Our articulations originated with string players. To a string player staccato means "light attack." Copy that, unless in contemporary music where is means a secco note.