Re: an extremely imperfect proposition:
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:14 am
I only recommend that with which I have firsthand familiarity, or very close secondhand experience, as in a trusted peer's playing of said horn in my presence. Especially no online advice - not even from here - and no sway from manufacturer's reps unless I actually have opportunity to play for more than a couple of toots. Example is a model (newly popular brand) that a retired but accomplished pro in my main (college) group recently acquired that I strongly feel is thin in low registers. My bias is towards long-established brands, and possibly a now-displaced attitude of getting what you pay for.
It's a lot easier in the oboe world. You can count quality makers on one hand, and one company in particular makes some damn good oboes at student-affordable prices, where for all intents the cheapest model plays and sounds (at least in my hands) almost as good as the top-of-the-line. (Centering improves with price, however.)
For new students I recommend against well-used horns, especially oboes. My experience is many have defects that make them too difficult to play well. I had one oboe student several years ago whose parents followed the (oboe-ignorant) band director's advice, and spent nearly a K-buck fixing a "cheap" wooden oboe from a lesser maker that turned out to be a Franken-oboe of mixed parts. The student had migrated from several years on clarinet and had reasonable chops, but we struggled for months getting even tone and intonation, heaven help us on high register. I loaned her my backup (student model) oboe for a concert, and, long story short, she quit shortly thereafter in the realization that her cobbled oboe was unplayably stuffy, which I had previously confirmed but more or less kept my mouth shut. Hence my resistance to used horns of unknown provenance.
I have a new oboe student starting next week. As has become my usual practice since the Franken-oboe experience, first thing I do is check their instrument. I haven't seen it yet, but I think in this case it's a school horn that has had very little play time. If I can't get anything good out of it, they never will, so my plan if that turns out to be the case is to loan my backup and send the school's horn to a trusted shop for rework.
It's a lot easier in the oboe world. You can count quality makers on one hand, and one company in particular makes some damn good oboes at student-affordable prices, where for all intents the cheapest model plays and sounds (at least in my hands) almost as good as the top-of-the-line. (Centering improves with price, however.)
For new students I recommend against well-used horns, especially oboes. My experience is many have defects that make them too difficult to play well. I had one oboe student several years ago whose parents followed the (oboe-ignorant) band director's advice, and spent nearly a K-buck fixing a "cheap" wooden oboe from a lesser maker that turned out to be a Franken-oboe of mixed parts. The student had migrated from several years on clarinet and had reasonable chops, but we struggled for months getting even tone and intonation, heaven help us on high register. I loaned her my backup (student model) oboe for a concert, and, long story short, she quit shortly thereafter in the realization that her cobbled oboe was unplayably stuffy, which I had previously confirmed but more or less kept my mouth shut. Hence my resistance to used horns of unknown provenance.
I have a new oboe student starting next week. As has become my usual practice since the Franken-oboe experience, first thing I do is check their instrument. I haven't seen it yet, but I think in this case it's a school horn that has had very little play time. If I can't get anything good out of it, they never will, so my plan if that turns out to be the case is to loan my backup and send the school's horn to a trusted shop for rework.