TubeNet

Ltrain wrote:Apples vs Oranges...

4P+1R vs 4P comp.

A more fair comparison would be Wessex Cavalry vs Eastman 853...

Build quality of the Eastman will win hands down.

Patrase wrote:I have never played the Eastman, but re the Gnagey:

The valve ergonomics are good, relatively sort stroke, relatively close together. Slides are easy to reach. I did find the second valve slide filled with water pretty quickly.

Instrument has a killer low range. Easier to nail than compensating Eb tubas I have played.

A band friend played a Gnagey against his Norwegian Star and said the Star had a better high range but the Gnagey had better low range. He normally uses a pt 65, so with a pt64 you could probably improve the high range on the Gnagey.

The lower range fingering on any 4+1 Eb isn't as easy as a compensating tuba, IMHO, so if the Eastman is compensating then fingering will be easier, if the third valve compensating loop is long enough. I own a 4+1 Eb tuba and if I played it more then would convert to a 6 valve configuration option. So guess I am a bit weird in that regard as no one else seems to do that.

Thanks for the information. Much appreciated. This is what I was looking for. Haven't really seen that much about the Gnagey, especially lately and am curious what owners think of the horn. I won't be in a position to play them back to back unfortunately.


But standard disclaimer - play them both. Specifically my advice is play them both with a tuning drone and as many different mouthpeices as you can supply/beg/borrow/steal and see which one you can play best in tune with any of those mouthpieces. Focus on how well the 2nd, 3rd and 4th partials are in tune in particular. Whichever has those lined up nicely would be the one to get, assuming alternate fingering brings 5th partial in tune (if out of tune) and the higher partials are manageable.

Douglas wrote:In that price range, you may also want to look at a used Minel Weston 2141. They play really well and the quality is hard to argue with.