Detachable bits - Tubas.
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 5:37 am
Does anyone have experience of tubas that come to bits like bassoons, saxes etc. to aid transport?
I saw one with a bell which had two detachable sections. These fitted one into the larger, like mixing bowls. They, in turn, matched the gaps in the tuba's upper body fitting within the upper bow in a neat suitcase BUT the heavy receptor rings and bulky reinforcement made the bell very ugly.
I have a French horn with a screw fitted bell that looks great - no lumpy rings etc. Its case is a slim neat box. Is it feasible to make a tuba bell in three parts but with invisible joints? Why can't all the extra-support metal rings and screws, if nec, be on the inside of the bell?
Also, why not go further (a la Courtois of ancient memory) and have detachable upper bows, mouthpipes, valves sections, sections of tubing.
Yes, the question is would all that be worth the advantage of having a slim case. But for a more generous sized 'travel tuba' it may be. You could have a reasonable size instrument in a compact case.
I saw one with a bell which had two detachable sections. These fitted one into the larger, like mixing bowls. They, in turn, matched the gaps in the tuba's upper body fitting within the upper bow in a neat suitcase BUT the heavy receptor rings and bulky reinforcement made the bell very ugly.
I have a French horn with a screw fitted bell that looks great - no lumpy rings etc. Its case is a slim neat box. Is it feasible to make a tuba bell in three parts but with invisible joints? Why can't all the extra-support metal rings and screws, if nec, be on the inside of the bell?
Also, why not go further (a la Courtois of ancient memory) and have detachable upper bows, mouthpipes, valves sections, sections of tubing.
Yes, the question is would all that be worth the advantage of having a slim case. But for a more generous sized 'travel tuba' it may be. You could have a reasonable size instrument in a compact case.