'Sound' comparison VMI 101 to tubas I know

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
Patrase
bugler
bugler
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:02 pm

'Sound' comparison VMI 101 to tubas I know

Post by Patrase »

Hi,

For those that have played them, sound wise, how does the VMI 101 compare to a Yamaha Neo Bb or rotary PT6 tuba or Besson 994? (yes different but what I and band mate not on tubenet am familiar with). Particularly in the low/middle register. Does the VMI have similar 'weight/breadth' down low to those models?
Miraphone Norwegian Star
Yamaha YBB-632 Bb Neo
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: 'Sound' comparison VMI 101 to tubas I know

Post by bort »

"Less sound"

Not less volume, but the 101 is a 4/4 tuba, and will sound like a 4/4 tuba. Totally classic and a great sound... Just not a huge tuba, and that's ok
Patrase
bugler
bugler
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:02 pm

Re: 'Sound' comparison VMI 101 to tubas I know

Post by Patrase »

Hi,

Yes bloke I mean the one that you posted a picture of, thanks.
Miraphone Norwegian Star
Yamaha YBB-632 Bb Neo
Heavy_Metal
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1734
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:42 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA

Re: 'Sound' comparison VMI 101 to tubas I know

Post by Heavy_Metal »

bloke wrote:Image

These sound like Alexanders, offer very good intonation, a very nice/clear sound, very good projection, very secure in all ranges (including extreme extremes) and only offer the typical intonation issue of a "flat 5th partial" (same as Miraphone 186).
This- not *quite* the same as an Alex, but close enough that it's easy to blend with one (or two, in my case).
Principal tuba, Bel Air Community Band
Old (early 1900s?) Alexander BBb proto-163
1976 Sonora (B&S 101) 4-rotor BBb
1964 Conn 20J/21J BBb (one body, both bells)
~1904 York 3P BBb Helicon
Old Alex Comp.F, in shop
Post Reply