I’m looking for input on the following horns that I’ve found for sale in my price range, but I am not familiar with the models.
Mirafone 180 F
&
Cerveny CFB-653
All information is appreciated!
Horn Comparison Input
Forum rules
Reminder: "Go fund me" requests are not allowed and should be reported. All requests will be deleted. If you are Looking to trade an instrument, We are requiring all ads to have the following information. Approximate trade value, Brand, Model, and location (for instruments, not accessories)
Reminder: "Go fund me" requests are not allowed and should be reported. All requests will be deleted. If you are Looking to trade an instrument, We are requiring all ads to have the following information. Approximate trade value, Brand, Model, and location (for instruments, not accessories)
- Patrick.Wade.Tuba
- bugler
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:54 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
-
- pro musician
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:59 am
- Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Re: Horn Comparison Input
I've only played 1 Cervery F tuba and 3 or 4 of that model Mirafone. The Cerveny is what I would probably get if I had to buy one of those two sight unseen.
Cerveny:
The sound on the one that I played was more inline with my concept of an F tuba. The pitch was decent enough and the build quality was alright. I would have probably vented the first valve and might have wanted a second valve slide kick added later depending on how the pitch settled once I played the thing for a few months. It was nice, but did not really get me excited about it.
Mirafone:
To me, the Mirafone 180 is pretty small and not that useful of a horn. While I am sure that you could play anything that you needed to on it, the question is would you want to? It would be neat to have one as a second F tuba if I only had access to a larger F (ie MRP, Wilson, MW 45slp, ect).
Have you looked at that Rudy F that Sasha recently posted? It might be a better all-around F tuba than either of these. Just my $0.02 for what ever that is worth these days.
Cerveny:
The sound on the one that I played was more inline with my concept of an F tuba. The pitch was decent enough and the build quality was alright. I would have probably vented the first valve and might have wanted a second valve slide kick added later depending on how the pitch settled once I played the thing for a few months. It was nice, but did not really get me excited about it.
Mirafone:
To me, the Mirafone 180 is pretty small and not that useful of a horn. While I am sure that you could play anything that you needed to on it, the question is would you want to? It would be neat to have one as a second F tuba if I only had access to a larger F (ie MRP, Wilson, MW 45slp, ect).
Have you looked at that Rudy F that Sasha recently posted? It might be a better all-around F tuba than either of these. Just my $0.02 for what ever that is worth these days.
-
- TubeNet Sponsor
- Posts: 1472
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:49 am
- Location: Campbell, CA
- Contact:
Re: Horn Comparison Input
The Mirafone 180 is a very small F tuba, by today's standards. I have one. If you ever get out to Cali, you are welcome to come here and play it.
Tony Clements
https://www.symphonysanjose.org/perform ... s/?REF=MTM
https://www.symphonysanjose.org/perform ... s/?REF=MTM