Value of larger bore 4th valve? Bookmark and Share

Re: Value of larger bore 4th valve?

Postby bloke » Sun Aug 11, 2019 10:36 am

iiipopes wrote:
bloke wrote:not testable...
Therefore any theories or opinions will remain pure conjecture.

Well, it may be testable, but who wants to unsolder a perfectly good 4th valve with its circuit and encounter unnecessarily the risks of reassembly involved, if the person involved is not in the R&D department of a brass musical instrument factory?

This may be something to propose to the good folks at Wessex, as they are very careful and thorough in their R&D when developing a new model. For example, they completely re-engineered the 4th valve circuit of their 4-front-valve compensating euph after player trials and feedback.


It's not testable - not even subjectively (via gathering of opinions, which are not scientific), because the larger-bore and smaller-bore circuits could not be instantaneous interchanged on the same instrument...and (even if two same-model instruments were built with two different 4th-circuit bore sizes) - as many of us have experienced - two same-model instruments (with all of the same bore sizes and all of the same everything) can play differently - certainly differently in the "low range".
User avatar
bloke
musician/technician/innovator
musician/technician/innovator
 
Posts: 43887
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: western Tennessee

Re: Value of larger bore 4th valve?

Postby iiipopes » Mon Aug 12, 2019 11:24 pm

bloke wrote:
iiipopes wrote:
bloke wrote:not testable...
Therefore any theories or opinions will remain pure conjecture.

Well, it may be testable, but who wants to unsolder a perfectly good 4th valve with its circuit and encounter unnecessarily the risks of reassembly involved, if the person involved is not in the R&D department of a brass musical instrument factory?

This may be something to propose to the good folks at Wessex, as they are very careful and thorough in their R&D when developing a new model. For example, they completely re-engineered the 4th valve circuit of their 4-front-valve compensating euph after player trials and feedback.


It's not testable - not even subjectively (via gathering of opinions, which are not scientific), because the larger-bore and smaller-bore circuits could not be instantaneous interchanged on the same instrument...and (even if two same-model instruments were built with two different 4th-circuit bore sizes) - as many of us have experienced - two same-model instruments (with all of the same bore sizes and all of the same everything) can play differently - certainly differently in the "low range".

Re-read my post. I didn't say it was testable, I said it may be testable. The mechanical logistics, for example, a quick-release valve set, Jupiter style, might work, or something else, or it might not. From a conventional unsolder-resolder perspective, I agree with your view that it is not. That is why I suggested this may be an R&D project for a manufacturer.
"Bessophone" w/ 2-piece Imperial Blokepiece,
Lexan 32.6 Modified Helleberg rim & modified .080 extender
Wessex BR115 & B&H 3-valve comp w/ Wick Ultra SMB6
King Super 20 trumpet w/ Bach 3C/76
Fanned fret bass and electric guitars
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
 
Posts: 8090
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Previous

Return to Repair, Modification, and Construction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest