Page 1 of 1

Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 6:01 am
by imperialbari

Re: Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 7:56 am
by SousaSaver
It does for 3 Euros (this price of the listing when I checked it.)

Re: Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 8:09 am
by imperialbari
Of course!

Let’s say the main bugle is really worthwhile, then it might make sense buying a for-real valve block to mount on it. Otherwise exactly the F tuba in my opinion has very few ensemble options with only 3 valves.

Klaus

Re: Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 10:26 am
by imperialbari
bloke wrote:' looks Eb-ish.

True!

Which makes it slightly more useful in a band context, where the low Bb is a quite important note.

A bit odd that this is the second auction out of Poland within a week or so, where we end up disputing the announced pitch.

Klaus

Re: Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 8:05 pm
by imperialbari
bloke wrote:' could be an ultra-low-pitch F tuba...??
with is tuning slide extended to be within the reach of an ultra *****-wing player.

Re: Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 8:07 pm
by TheHatTuba
It has the same range as a cimbasso..... That doesnt mean it sounds like on though

Re: Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 11:42 am
by Kevin Hendrick
bloke wrote:' looks Eb-ish.
If I'm not mistaken, the current version of this horn is the Cerveny CEB-641 (Eb), which appears to mostly-share the main bugle with the CFB-651 (F) -- the primary difference being the main tuning slide (vertical-pull for the F, horizontal-pull for the Eb) adding about a foot of straight-bore tubing to the Eb. IIRC, both the Eb and F are still available with three rotors, as well as four (and five for the F).

Re: Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 5:25 pm
by Lingon
Hmm, the CFB 641 seems to share the dimesnsions of the eBay offer with a hegth of approx 90 cm and about 36 cm bell size (sorry for the old world's measurements), Cerveny's Eb instruments is approx 102 cm. So the polski tuba seems to be an F. Maybe the fake tones are very good?!...
(Found on the net, 3 valve Cerveny 76413PX, F-Tuba/3)

Re: Does a 3RV F tuba make sense?

Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 5:38 pm
by Kevin Hendrick
Lingon wrote:Hmm, the CFB 641 seems to share the dimesnsions of the eBay offer with a hegth of approx 90 cm and about 36 cm bell size (sorry for the old world's measurements), Cerveny's Eb instruments is approx 102 cm. So the polski tuba seems to be an F. Maybe the fake tones are very good?!...
(Found on the net, 3 valve Cerveny 76413PX, F-Tuba/3)
Well spotted! I missed the pics with the dimensions before. :D