Off "The Big Five?"

Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Forum rules
Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Post Reply

What do you think of this article?

Highly agree
1
4%
Somewhat agree
7
28%
Neither agree nor disagree
10
40%
Somewhat disagree
4
16%
Highly disagree
3
12%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
Steve Marcus
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1843
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:18 am
Location: Chicago area
Contact:

Off "The Big Five?"

Post by Steve Marcus »

From today's New York Sun comes this article:
New York Drops Off the List Of ‘Big Five' Orchestras


BY FRED KIRSHNIT - Special to the Sun
December 5, 2006

Since the 1950s, the concept of the "Big Five" American orchestras has held sway and influenced ticket buyers to attend what are ostensibly the most reliably consistent performances. Here in New York, the grouping is especially significant: Each of these orchestras appears in town every year. The time is right for a radical realignment — and a revamped "Big Five" is in order.

IN: THE PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY

Mariss Jansons accomplished miracles as an orchestra builder. The group was very good under William Steinberg in the 1950s and even survived the Lorin Maazel years, but Mr. Jansons, son of the Latvian conductor Arvid Jansons, brought with him a solid sense of discipline and an incredibly detailed approach to the maximizing of inner voices. Right now, it is the cleanest, crispest ensemble in America. The wind section alone is worth the price of admission. Tonight the Pittsburgh Symphony appears at Carnegie Hall, so you can judge for yourself.

But music director Mr. Jansons recently announced his intention to move back to Europe permanently, taking over not one, but two of the world's finest ensembles, and leaving Heinz Hall forever.

Now the powers that be have spent their money not on a new music director but rather on spin doctors. The new paradigm is for the orchestra to be led by Sir Andrew Davis, Yan Pascal Tortelier, and Marek Janowski. And apparently, the twain shall never meet. The plan is for each conductor to instill his own ethnicity into the mix and for the public to swoon with delight at the innovation. The board had better be prepared to authorize a lot of expensive rehearsal time.

OUT: THE PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA

Despite having been so good for so long, the Philadelphia Orchestra has quite recently lost its edge. After enjoying the heralded reigns of Stokowski, Ormandy, Muti and Sawallisch, all of whom preserved that patented "fabulous Philadelphians" sound, the players were extremely upset by management's decision, taken unilaterally and without consultation, to hire Christoph Eschenbach. That signature sound is now unraveling at the seams.

In 2004 at Carnegie Hall, Mr. Eschenbach milked the last movement of Mahler's Symphony No. 3 shamelessly — he had undoubtedly practiced each preening gesture in front of a mirror. The "I'll Be Seeing You" theme was drawn out into an almost unrecognizable length of pulled taffy: Even Liberace performed it less histrionically. He does look good up there — like Yul Brynner in "Once More With Feeling" — but, isn't it the sound that counts? Give me the dumpy Mr. Ormandy any day.

But there is hope: Mr. Eschenbach recently announced that he will not seek a contract extension after 2008.

IN: THE CINCINNATI SYMPHONY

The demographic of James Levine's hometown is largely Germanic and they are the proud boosters of the oldest symphony hall in America. A fine ensemble under Schippers, Gielen, and Lopez-Cobos, the orchestra has truly blossomed under the son of another world-class conductor. Paavo Jarvi has proven to be the finest of his generation, a sensitive and result-oriented maestro. Nurtured in a great tradition since birth but still independent enough to challenge it, Mr. Jarvi has made his mark decisively and with great panache. The orchestra has never sounded better and presents interesting and varied programming on a regular basis.

OUT: THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA

The finest orchestra in America in the 1960s, with the sainted George Szell on the podium, occupied Severance Hall. The group also had a pretty good assistant conductor named Jimmy Levine. It later survived Maestro Maazel's rather sloppy legacy and tightened up once again under the iron hand of Christoph von Dohnanyi. Everything seemed to be going its way, until its board made a decision that can only be described as screwy.

Austrian Franz Welser-Moest had a terrible reputation when chosen to take over. Crucified by the British press — they quickly dubbed him "Frankly Worst Than Most" — he was hunted down in London as relentlessly as Bill Sykes. His tenure at the head of their Philharmonic was not just stormy but deeply unsatisfying for audiences at the Royal Festival Hall.

In Cleveland, performances have been uniformly poor, unpopular with both patrons and critics alike. For four years now, Maestro has brought his charges to Carnegie and my critical reaction has been somewhat subdued as I have been forced to concentrate on physically controlling my impulses to shudder on a regular basis.

IN: THE LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC

Nobody in this part of the world seems to know how good this ensemble really is, but this, I believe, is strictly a matter of East Coast superciliousness. Esa-Pekka Salonen is a dynamic, exciting presence, and a first-rate composer to boot. His ability to prod his forces into extraordinary bursts of color while still keeping proper balance allows the left coast Phil to dance on winds positively fairy-blown. The strings are lush but nimble, the woodwinds precise and poetic, the brass warm and accurate, the percussion bright and crisp. All are allowed to let loose in a rather elastic manner. Perhaps Mr. Salonen's secret is a palpable confidence that allows his players to breathe freely while still under his strict control. Whatever the formula, he has applied it exceptionally well. For 20th century music, this is the band of choice.

OUT: THE NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC

Not even the best orchestra on the plaza.

Limiting our discussion to the modern era, the local Phil has been deficient for a long time. A pedestrian string sound, a tendency to lose intonation as a piece drags along, an inconsistent trumpet section, and a sometimes frightful set of French horns are just background for an ensemble that often seems to have little investment in its own performances. Add to the ensemble's frustrating nonchalance a conductor in Lorin Maazel who simply cannot leave a piece alone and the net result is often blaring, leadfooted, and embarrassing. The worst part may be that, on certain evenings, they can still conjure a decent performance. At Avery Fisher, it often seems that attitude is more critical than aptitude.

ON THE BUBBLE: THE CHICAGO SYMPHONY

No change in status, but the future is key. The annoyingly inconsistent reign of Daniel Barenboim is finally over. Who will shepherd this great group going forward? Rumor has it that the very talented Kent Nagano will leave troubled Montreal and settle on Michigan Avenue. Under steward Pierre Boulez, the group appears in town later this week.

HANGING ON: THE BOSTON SYMPHONY

In the late 1990s, Seiji Ozawa became the most infamous victim in Massachusetts since Sacco and Vanzetti. His troubles began with The Great Nutcracker War, when he took his orchestra to Asia in November and December 1996, leaving the city without a season of Christmas music performances. Then he dared to assert his leadership at the Tanglewood festival, replacing certain key personnel who were beloved by the press. The crushing blow came from New York critics, who wrote articles claiming the BSO had lost all professionalism and that its sound was devoid of proper intonation and balance. This avalanche of disrespect eventually led to Mr. Ozawa abandoning his lifelong artistic project and signing on with the Vienna State Opera, where, I am happy to report, everyone loves him.

Now James Levine is in charge and this should save the day. But some of his performances have been blowsy and imbalanced, as witness the recent sour Brahms First at Carnegie Hall.

Without question, Mr. Boulez is correct when he states, "Music is not the Olympics." Yet it is natural for critics and audience members to rank performing groups based on their overall abilities. With today's high ticket prices, don't we want to have some assurances that the concert will be worth it?
The Principal Tuba players of at least five of the orchestras named in this article lurk and occasionally post on TubeNet. It would be very interesting to read their viewpoints on this article. On the other hand, it may be too sensitive an issue for them to comment on publicly while maintaining/protecting their professionalism...

Is there validity in the concept of rating the major orchestras at all?
Steve Marcus
http://www.facebook.com/steve.marcus.88
Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11513
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

I wouldn't worry about their reactions. Every working pro knows critics are the LAST to know, and often make up what they don't. There is some truth to what Mr. Kirshnit implies about Philly, but if criticism bothers you, you're in the wrong business!
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
The Impaler
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 312
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Carrollton, GA
Contact:

Post by The Impaler »

Gonna have to agree with windshieldbug on this one.....

I'm having a "History of the World, Part One" moment right now. You know, the one that goes something like:

"And, with the advent of the artist came the inevitable advent of the critic." Without any bias or preconceptions, I gotta wonder how much of that article is just pissing in the wind.....

my 2 cents.....
Cale Self

Assistant Professor of Music
Acting Director of Bands & Instructor of Low Brass
University of West Georgia
Carrollton, GA
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

Scooby Tuba wrote:Pissing in the wind is right. If things don't realign themselves with all the orchestras (and many others) mentioned and they don't get their collective heads out of their butts, the presented argument will be akin to who was the last to make the best buggy whip.
Thank you for saying that! Image
User avatar
sc_curtis
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: Off "The Big Five?"

Post by sc_curtis »

New York Drops Off the List Of ‘Big Five' Orchestras


BY FRED KIRSHNIT - Special to the Sun
December 5, 2006

IN: THE PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY

...and even survived the Lorin Maazel years, but...

OUT: THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA

It later survived Maestro Maazel's rather sloppy legacy...

OUT: THE NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC

Add to the ensemble's frustrating nonchalance a conductor in Lorin Maazel who simply cannot leave a piece alone and the net result is often blaring, leadfooted, and embarrassing.
Wow, he really wishes they had a different conductor up there!

I never put any weight to what critics say, mostly because I think they like to "hate" things just to be controversial. Yes, sometimes they can give good points on why something is a certain way, but there are too many out there who just seem to be fake.
www.thetubaplayer.com

Current stable:
PT6
Meinl Weston 2250
Rudolf Meinl 3/4 CC
YFB621S
YCB621S
Custom BBb Cimbasso
quinterbourne
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by quinterbourne »

Who decides which orchestras are in "The Big Five?"

Or is that a stupid question... ?

:?
trulvious
bugler
bugler
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:27 pm
Location: Philadelphia Area
Contact:

Post by trulvious »

The big 5 is determined by operating budget alone. I understand the article is looking past this fact...I'm just trying to answer the question as to how the top 5 is actually determined.
joebob
bugler
bugler
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:51 pm

Post by joebob »

Critics are often blowhards, however, in New York city, the critics are able to hear all of these orchestras somewhat regularly in Carnegie Hall. This gives them a perspective that those of us not able to hear these orchestras regularly don't have. It would be easier for me to agree or disagree with this article if I had heard the same performances of these orchestras that the author attended.
User avatar
LoyalTubist
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Arcadia, CA
Contact:

Post by LoyalTubist »

I think another factor in this is that all of the good ol' boys in the orchestra have retired. This might also explain the lower operating budgets (lower seniority people get lower wages). The critics are generally skeptical of new things (and people).
________________________________________________________
You only have one chance to make a first impression. Don't blow it.
Post Reply