Let's Get Down to Business

Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Forum rules
Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Post Reply
Chuck Jackson
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1811
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Let's Get Down to Business

Post by Chuck Jackson »

Screw all this Verdi/Cimbasso, End of the World, Piston/Rotor crap. Here is the pressing question of the month:

Gene Wilder/Willy Wonka vs Johnny Depp/Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

Discuss, and remember you get extra points with a total digression of this topic into the strengths/weaknesses of the two opposing Oompah Loompahs.

You will be a total nudnik if the tuba comes up once.

Let the games begin!!!!!!!!!!!!
I drank WHAT?!!-Socrates
User avatar
Uncle Buck
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Contact:

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by Uncle Buck »

I'm probably in the minority, but the Johnny Depp/Deep Roy version fit my sense of humor a little better. It was more edgy, which I also think is more consistent with the book. I liked that the songs used the actual lyrics from the book.

I like the Gene Wilder version, but I love just about every moment of the Johnny Depp version. I was going to start listing all my favorite moments, but realized it would be too long of a list.

One general example: In the Wilder film, the Oompah Loompahs were pretty funny in the dance scenes when they look like they're humping each other. But in the Depp version, it leaves you really wondering a few times if the kids are going to ever come out alive.
oldbandnerd
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1031
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:43 pm
Location: No matter where you go... there you are .
Contact:

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by oldbandnerd »

I like both of them for the very reasons that make them so differnt. The original one was just fun and wacky with just a hint of insanity and horror. The second one was "somebody smoked some really good **** " before they wrote this script. Tottaly insane with really dark humor.
If I had to pick one over the other I would choose the original for sentimental reasons. I saw it in the theaters when I was 8 and can still remember it. Tickets were $1.50 and I remember my parents gripping about the cost to take 3 kids to the movies.Probaly spent at least $6.00 all together with popcorn and drinks. That's a lot for a dad on a Tech. Sgt.'s salary back then.
Image
Mark

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by Mark »

I thought we weren't supposed to discuss politics.
Chuck Jackson
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1811
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by Chuck Jackson »

Mark wrote:I thought we weren't supposed to discuss politics.
I'm invoking that Executive thingee that everyone since Reagan has abused..........................So There!!!!

Chuck "TUBA"Jackson
I drank WHAT?!!-Socrates
alfredr
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:02 pm

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by alfredr »

I just feel like this thread needs a line from "The Princess Bride."

You see how easy it is to digress? Gene Wilder -> "Young Frankenstein' -> Mel Brooks -> Rob Reiner -> "The Princess Bride"

alfredr (my father is alive and well, thank you)
alfredr
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:02 pm

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by alfredr »

And of course, for the tuba digressionists among us: Gene Wilder -> Alec Wilder -> Less than six months till TubaChristmas

"I am your father, Buzz."
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by bort »

Original, no question.

Why does Hollywood constantly need to keep remaking movies?
we3kings
bugler
bugler
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:19 pm

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by we3kings »

The majority of Hollywood can't come up with a good new idea for a movie.
User avatar
Tubajug
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1712
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:23 pm
Location: Lincoln, NE

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by Tubajug »

alfredr wrote:I just feel like this thread needs a line from "The Princess Bride."
"Stop this rhyming and I mean it!"

"Anybody want a peanut?"
Jordan
King 2341 with a Holton "Monster" Eb bell
Eb Frankentuba
Martin Medium Eb Helicon

If at first you don't succeed, skydiving's probably not for you.
User avatar
gwwilk
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:06 am
Location: Lincoln, NE

Re: Let's Get Down to Business

Post by gwwilk »

DP wrote:
bort wrote:Original, no question.

Why does Hollywood constantly need to keep remaking movies?
Because sheeple when busy with diversions remain sheeple?

Perish the thought that decades of trained consumerism would be lost through neglect!
I believe you're omitting much of advertising's 'venerable' history, Dale.
With ads: http://mashable.com/2011/12/26/history-advertising/
Without ads: http://5.mshcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/ ... tising.jpg
Jerry Wilkins
gwwilk@gmail.com
Image
Post Reply