Code: Select all
But remember comments about inherent athletic ability, 'endowment', intelligence? Why judge a group based on "tendancies"?
Yes, I believe there are certain inherent strengths and weaknesses of the respective races. To not believe this is to tell yourself that what can be observed through the scientific method is incorrect. Are you aware that people of African ancestry have more tendonous muscle mass, which aids in more explosive speed? Are you aware that Asians are stronger in the fields of Mathematics and Science(nonverbal phenomena) than other races? Are you saying that Herrnstein and Murray's Bell Curve is hogwash? Here are the main claims of it:
Intelligence exists and is accurately measurable across racial, language, and national boundaries.
Intelligence is one, if not the most, important correlative factor in economic, social, and overall success in America, and is becoming more important.
Intelligence is largely (40% to 80%) genetically heritable.
No one has so far been able to manipulate IQ long term to any significant degree through changes in environmental factors - except for child adoption - and in light of their failure such approaches are becoming less promising.
The USA has been in denial regarding these facts, and in light of these findings a better public understanding of the nature of intelligence and its social correlates is necessary to guide future policy decisions in America.
Why judge a group based on tendencies? I was merely arguing that there are empirically observable tendencies that the respective races have.
Quote:
It's a tough call. It's also something that world society today needs to deal with more thoroughly. IMO.
This is a bunch of sh!t that has been OVER-dealt with SO much by "society" that people actually have made a g-d profession of discussing it (and out of stirring others up over it).
Amen.