It's interesting to see that the old attitudes haven't died in the South. I remember when JFK was running for president, there were hushed rumors about Catholics eating babies and having secret Satanic rites. And yet, no one in the Bible Belt seems to have a problem with a majority-Catholic Supreme Court.the elephant wrote:I know many here on the buckle of the Bible Belt do not consider Catholicism to be "Christian" at all (uhhhh . . . despite the overwhelming presence of CHRIST in the daily practice of the religion . . . ) and see the Catholic church as a totally separate religion.
Like it or not, there exists partial communion between the church of Rome and many other Protestant religions, including the Episcopal Church.
"Fanatics" can take all sorts of forms in the Middle East. The Maronite Catholics (an eastern rite church that dates from the 7th century) and the Druze (an Islamic breakaway; a rather close-knit group that does not accept converts) have been at each other's throats for 150 years in Lebanon. So, there are Middle Eastern religious fanatics of many faiths.While I fail to agree with nearly everything espoused by the local, cultish stripe of fanatical religion (I hate fanatics in the Middle East almost as much as I hate them locally) I think that Catholicism is distinctive and large enough to deserve a separate billing in your poll if you divide LDS and JW from "Christian".