Windows 7

Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Forum rules
Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
User avatar
MartyNeilan
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4876
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:06 am
Location: Practicing counting rests.

Re: Windows 7

Post by MartyNeilan »

TubaTodd wrote: With all due respect, no, Vista's plethora of problems did not stem from that "type of advice." Vista was a culmination of ideas to provide users something "new" that they would ultimately be "forced" into buying due to a) change in format [ie .docx, .xlsx, etc] or b) discontinued support of a previous product. Of course instead of taking a page out of Apple's book, producing a highly polished, highly refined and well thought out product (I'm NOT saying it is perfect) for each release, Microsoft decided "let's change this..oh and that...and let's change the kernel in such a way that it causes all kinds of hardware compatibility issues.
Sorry, but you are mixing up apples and oranges. The formats of which you speak are part of the Office 2007 suite. These are applications, which are completely separate from the operating system. Most Windows XP users I know are currently running Office 2007, and you can run older versions of Office under Vista. Don't forget, that they make Office 2008 for the Mac users, which uses the same new formats.
Do I like Office 2007? Absolutely not. It is bloatware to the extreme. However, I eventually had to adopt it several months ago, out of necessity, when the converters for previous version of office just weren't cutting it.
Back on topic, I like Windows 7. I think that it is what Vista should have been in the first place. Hopefully they will do a similar overhaul with the next version of Office.
User avatar
TubaTodd
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama

Re: Windows 7

Post by TubaTodd »

MartyNeilan wrote:
TubaTodd wrote: With all due respect, no, Vista's plethora of problems did not stem from that "type of advice." Vista was a culmination of ideas to provide users something "new" that they would ultimately be "forced" into buying due to a) change in format [ie .docx, .xlsx, etc] or b) discontinued support of a previous product. Of course instead of taking a page out of Apple's book, producing a highly polished, highly refined and well thought out product (I'm NOT saying it is perfect) for each release, Microsoft decided "let's change this..oh and that...and let's change the kernel in such a way that it causes all kinds of hardware compatibility issues.
Sorry, but you are mixing up apples and oranges. The formats of which you speak are part of the Office 2007 suite. These are applications, which are completely separate from the operating system. Most Windows XP users I know are currently running Office 2007, and you can run older versions of Office under Vista. Don't forget, that they make Office 2008 for the Mac users, which uses the same new formats.
Do I like Office 2007? Absolutely not. It is bloatware to the extreme. However, I eventually had to adopt it several months ago, out of necessity, when the converters for previous version of office just weren't cutting it.
Back on topic, I like Windows 7. I think that it is what Vista should have been in the first place. Hopefully they will do a similar overhaul with the next version of Office.
The reference to the new Office 2007 formats were not intended to be related to a change in Vista (I can see how my wording could be read that way...my bad), but as an example of change in a format. Yes, you can download the OfficeCompatibility pack for 2007/2008 formats for both Mac and Windows.
Todd Morgan
Besson 995
Post Reply