Not Guilty

Charlie Goodman · Post by **Charlie Goodman** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:33 pm

Michael Jackson's lawyer said Tuesday that the pop star is going to be more careful from now on and not let children into his bed anymore because "it makes him vulnerable to false charges."

Wouldn't it be great if he stopped letting kids into his bed because, maybe, perhaps, you know, he doesn't like having children in his bed? Wouldn't that be a fairly good reason not to let children in his bed?

TubaRay · Post by **TubaRay** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:11 pm

bloke wrote: Thank goodness! Now that this is all cleared up, I can - once again, send my son back over to the Neverland Ranch to sleep over.

Unfortunately, there is probably someone out there who believes this.

TubaRay · Post by **TubaRay** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:13 pm

Doc wrote: He's either a pedophile, or has the emotional maturity of a 10 year old.

I vote for the emotional maturity of a 10 year old.

Leland · Post by **Leland** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:11 pm

Lew wrote:There was enough reasonable doubt in the "victim's" story, and the Mother's bizarre behavior to drive a truck through. That isn't to say that Michael Jackson isn't a child molestor, just that in this case it wasn't proven.

That's how I see it.

If Michael's going to be convicted of anything, it'll have to be another family -- one that doesn't go around bugging celebs & corporations for cash -- that brings up charges.

Whether he did it or not, the prosecution wasn't going to win this case.

On a side note -- I'm hearing that a local band director wants to do a Michael Jackson show on the field this fall. If that's too controversial, then he'll do a Celine Dion show instead. And, no, I'm not making this up!