lgb&dtuba wrote:Fore!.... I mean, Pull.Eric B wrote:Unless you own a motorboat, gun, or golf clubs, there's not much to do here. Thankfully I have TubeNet.
That cracked me up!
lgb&dtuba wrote:Fore!.... I mean, Pull.Eric B wrote:Unless you own a motorboat, gun, or golf clubs, there's not much to do here. Thankfully I have TubeNet.
lgb&dtuba wrote:Fore!.... I mean, Pull.Eric B wrote:Unless you own a motorboat, gun, or golf clubs, there's not much to do here. Thankfully I have TubeNet.
windshieldbug wrote:lgb&dtuba wrote:Fore!.... I mean, Pull.Eric B wrote:Unless you own a motorboat, gun, or golf clubs, there's not much to do here. Thankfully I have TubeNet.
Avast!... I man Pull!... I mean, Fore!
YOU ARE QUITE OFF TOPIC...elimia wrote:Update: After using Mantel test to reduce autocorrelated variables, I re-ran the reduced set and further reduced the matrix to things with a correlation coefficient < 0.6. After overlaying spp x sites matrix against variables (log 10 transformed, of course), HUC 12 % mix forest cover and drainage area came out with the strongest patterns against family clusters. The drainage area relationship simply reinforces the hypothesis of Brown et al (1998) while the HUC 12 relationship seems to also be possibly correlated, as % forest cover could relate to area. I should rerun Spearmans test again to test for any cross-correlations I missed. Or hell, the HUC 12 could actually be a real signal and not just ecological noise. The easiest thing would be to just run a 2-way ANOVA against spp richness to see if they work on a univariate level. I should have done that first, that would also address the moderately unstable 2-dimensional solution I keep seeing in Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling despite aggressive data reduction and rarity removal (which truncates the outlier set). Of course, Canonical Correspondance Analysis would be a stronger test if I could make greater assumptions of linearity. It goes without saying that there is a greater risk of a Type I error with that test given the nature of the data.
glad you were able to figure out the stand issue! was it stable enough without extending the legs?MaryAnn wrote:Successfully played the Brass Caroling Roving Trio Gig with a modified stool for playing standing up. Mustached partner-in-crime took on the task since he is ever-so-much-more into perfection of details than Moi. It worked well and we'll save the PVC leg-extenders for next year. Stool rode in the back with the stands and the tuba got the front passenger seat floor space, with pillows protecting its tender body. We got back at about 9:15 p.m. and it was actually starting to get chilly outside.
MA
Um....don't understand the question. Stable enough without extending the legs? Whose legs? Its or mine? !! We extended the legs with PVC and yup it was stable. I think three legs (instead of the four the stool had to start with) might not have been quite as stable. It wasn't "pretty" but since it was dark out I don't think anybody cared. And the leg extenders are now in the shed in storage, which about guarantees that I'll play something else next year. Never know who is going to fink out / come through for this night-rider gig, and I have played everything...2nd tpt, horn, euph, and tuba, for it.rocksanddirt wrote:glad you were able to figure out the stand issue! was it stable enough without extending the legs?MaryAnn wrote:Successfully played the Brass Caroling Roving Trio Gig with a modified stool for playing standing up. Mustached partner-in-crime took on the task since he is ever-so-much-more into perfection of details than Moi. It worked well and we'll save the PVC leg-extenders for next year. Stool rode in the back with the stands and the tuba got the front passenger seat floor space, with pillows protecting its tender body. We got back at about 9:15 p.m. and it was actually starting to get chilly outside.
MA
Have to wonder if overwriting them would be any less boring ...bigpapajon wrote:After a 10-minute scientific study, it has been determined that underwriting insurance policies is twice as boring as eating chinese food.
Heiko Treibener had the pointiest ears I have seen of all tubists.If Harvey Phillips is "The Paganini of the Tuba" and Roger Bobo is "The Heifetz of the Tuba", who is "The Leonard Nimoy of the Tuba"...??...
...which leads to my big question- If Roger Bobo it the 'Heifetz of the Tuba', then who is the 'Roger Bobo of the Violin'?Mojo workin' wrote:Heiko Treibener had the pointiest ears I have seen of all tubists.If Harvey Phillips is "The Paganini of the Tuba" and Roger Bobo is "The Heifetz of the Tuba", who is "The Leonard Nimoy of the Tuba"...??...
The more important question would be who is the "Jack Benny of the Tuba"? I would vote for Bobo.
Hmmm ... seems to me that "if A = B, then B = A" applies to this one ...OldsRecording wrote:... If Roger Bobo it the 'Heifetz of the Tuba', then who is the 'Roger Bobo of the Violin'?
While I don't totally agree with Bloke, I will say that the best thing to happen to city government in California was the Giants building a state of the art, really nice ball park with NO public money. There had to be a referendum to change some zoning, otherwise it was totally their nickel, and now, in CA you cannot build a stadium using money that the voters have to approve. because they won't.bloke wrote:Those of us who look back to a better time and hold fond memories of sane functional cities are morally obligated to abandon cities (particularly those of us raising children) when they no longer serve our needs and when those who now rule these cities are completely and criminally unresponsive to our complaints. Those who stay behind and continue to contribute their monetary tolls are (except in a much more destructive way) likening themselves to those who will hand a few dollars (trying to convince themselves that the person will use it to purchase food/clothing) to the desperate who live under the overpasses and devote their lives to their next drink or their next hit on the crack-pipe.
The story that you tell is nearly the identical story that I read about most any American city with a population of 1/2 million or more, and even quite a few that are smaller in size than that.
Regarding Memphis, about this I am proud: The productive and the law-abiding have left and are continuing to leave by the hundreds of thousands, and businesses where these evacuees work are in the process of moving to where the evacuees have relocated. Places like this (if a majority of citizens continues to allow criminals to rein) need to collapse in on themselves sooner, rather than later.