Page 1 of 1
wow, people can be stupid
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 11:47 pm
by daktx2
Re: wow, people can be stupid
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 11:58 pm
by windshieldbug
daktx2 wrote:this doesnt really need a comment
Well, I'll try anyway: "Darn it! No matter how many times we tune, you're always flat!"
Re: wow, people can be stupid
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 2:39 pm
by BopEuph
windshieldbug wrote:Well, I'll try anyway: "Darn it! No matter how many times we tune, you're always flat!"
And no matter how much we pull you along, you're always dragging!
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 4:00 pm
by CJ Krause
Did
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:19 pm
by Kevin Hendrick
bloke wrote:' looks to me as if it could be
flat and sharp at the same time! 
Would that be
flarp or
shat? 
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:35 pm
by Brassdad
owner must have been a trombonist - he just couldn't help but slide through the piece
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:46 pm
by ai698
I hate it when that happens.

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:01 pm
by windshieldbug
What a great ad for the manufacurer, though...
"When you put it in 'park', our transmission STAYS in 'park'!
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:26 pm
by BopEuph
euphba wrote:daktx2, this is SO off topic you have NO idea..but I can't help but say something...
~cassie
As this is the "Off Topic" forum, there shoulnd't be a problem. After all, no one ever said the threads in the Off Topic forum had to stay on topic.
Nick
stupid
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:37 pm
by TubaRay
It took me a long time to put two and two together and get five. The topic is indicating that the driver was really stupid. I believe this shows that it is the TubeNet poster who haven't figured things out. This is 21st century America! One is never responsible for their our actions. There is very definitely lawsuit material here. The makers of the vehicle should have been able to determine the danger connected with this scenario and designed a vehicle that would stand up to such an action.
I'm still working on that B.S. degreeeeeeeeeee.
Re: stupid
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:45 pm
by Mark
TubaRay wrote:...The topic is indicating that the driver was really stupid. I believe this shows that it is the TubeNet poster who haven't figured things out. This is 21st century America! One is never responsible for their own actions. There is very definitely lawsuit material here...
Clearly, the manufacturer should have put a warning label on the visor. Except, if the visor is anything like mine, there is no room left for any more warning labels. Hmm, I think we should sue manufacturers for putting warning labels on the visors of our cars and thus causing distracted driving accidents when we read those labels while driving. Maybe there should be a warning label warning you not to read the warning labels while driving.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 5:06 pm
by MaryAnn
well, if I had done that....but I wouldn't have done that, because I simply am not that dumb, despite the red hair that has now faded to "blonde" due to the increasing amounts of white. Not dumb enough to do it, and not dumb enough to not notice the difference in towing "weight" and not dumb enough to not notice the sparks a teensy bit sooner. And not dumb enough to figure out something was going on when 14,321 people driving by were pointing and laughing their keesters off.
However, if I had done that....I would have gone out and bought two new wheels, put two new used tires on them, and THEN if it wouldn't go I'd have had it towed to the dealer to try to figure out why the tranny was acting so weird, and let HIM figure it out. Rather than get the picture put on the internet.
MA
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 7:06 pm
by windshieldbug
MaryAnn wrote:However, if I had done that....I would have gone out and bought two new wheels, put two new used tires on them, and THEN if it wouldn't go I'd have had it towed to the dealer to try to figure out why the tranny was acting so weird, and let HIM figure it out. Rather than get the picture put on the internet.
Maybe it WAS the result of being towed back to the dealership by the dealer!
