Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:11 pm
I hate to say it but I think UNC may take it all......
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:23 am
From someone who has seen "his team" get smacked around by Davidson a few times this year, I have to give them some respect in my bracket. Everyone knows about Curry, but their point guard is great and their inside game isn't too shabby, either.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:59 am
crazier
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:14 am
My 4 are even crazier. I've got an all-or-nothing philosophy when it comes to this kinda stuff. So, hopefully, some serious underdogs can manage some serious upsets.
UNC
USC
Stanford
Drake
UNC
USC
Stanford
Drake
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:33 pm
Personally, I really dug the year that Kansas came scarily close to losing to Holy Cross in the first round. I would absolutly LOVE to see a 16 seed knock off a #1. It is nice to see the Hoyas back in the tourney.wchoc86 wrote:Ucla Unc G-town and Texas for my final four.
(i can't wait to see how this year's Kansas' squad will find some delicious way to choke.)
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:41 pm
Meet your doom collegians.
I've been in the facebook top 50 the last two years.
I've been in the facebook top 50 the last two years.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:44 pm
I'm still pulling for Miami since they didn't make the Superbowl... 
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:55 pm
bloke wrote:just a tip for you who enjoy betting...and some people say that I'm psychic, btw:
Something in the back of my mind keeps telling me that this will be the year that a majority African-American team will dominate.
So we shouldn't bet on Wisconsin, UNC, or Duke?
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:40 pm
Don't forget Niagara's scare! Wasn't that against Kansas too? Not nearly as impressive as Holy Cross, but it deserves mention.OldsRecording wrote:Personally, I really dug the year that Kansas came scarily close to losing to Holy Cross in the first round. I would absolutly LOVE to see a 16 seed knock off a #1. It is nice to see the Hoyas back in the tourney.wchoc86 wrote:Ucla Unc G-town and Texas for my final four.
(i can't wait to see how this year's Kansas' squad will find some delicious way to choke.)
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:41 pm
Kansas pulled it off. First time ever all 4 #1 seeds are in the final four. Should be some good games next week.
For anyone paying attention, it looks like it will all be #1 vs.#2 in the elite 8 on the women's side.
For anyone paying attention, it looks like it will all be #1 vs.#2 in the elite 8 on the women's side.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:27 pm
Pretty odd when something happens in the tourney for the very first time in history, yet it seems somehow anticlimactic, unless, I suppose you are a fan of UCLA, UNC, Memphis or Kansas. I'll bet lots of people with no clue whatsoever about basketball will win their office pools, for no other reason then they just picked all the #1s to go all the way. After that, it's pretty much a 25% chance of getting it right.bearphonium wrote:Kansas pulled it off. First time ever all 4 #1 seeds are in the final four. Should be some good games next week.
For anyone paying attention, it looks like it will all be #1 vs.#2 in the elite 8 on the women's side.
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:52 pm
Man, I HATE it when people do what machines say...bearphonium wrote:First time ever all 4 #1 seeds are in the final four.
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 6:24 am
I hear you on the machines. HOWEVER, looking at the women's side, both #2 teams won last night--Stanford and LSU.
I was really pulling for Davidson to beat Kansas, though.
I was really pulling for Davidson to beat Kansas, though.
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:32 am
And for the update, if anyone cares at this point, both "favorite to win" teams (UCLA and UConn) were defeated in their semi-final games, so the machines didn't do it best after all.
Men: Go Memphis! (ain't been there in a while)
Women: Go Stanford! (SWMBO is an alum, and Tenn. won last year)
Men: Go Memphis! (ain't been there in a while)
Women: Go Stanford! (SWMBO is an alum, and Tenn. won last year)
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:07 pm
Oh boy. That terminator picture is begging for some tuba Photoshop work.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:09 pm
My bracket's were screwed up once Georgetown lost. I have an INTENSE hatred for the 3-point shot. Its a a hell of alot harder to score when you're under the basket with several people beating the hell out of you than it is to throw a shot up from 20ft away. They at least need to move it back to the NBA line. Ridiculous.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:24 pm
Hmmmm... John Calipari commented something about 'If the team did everything else right, free throws really don't matter' Hate to tell you this, John...
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:38 pm
Interesting to see the Kansas "choke" comments at the start of this thread.... Turns out that didn't happen this year (Thank You Stephen Curry for passing the ball).
I thought that last night's game was amazing. Really evenly matched teams. Both of them were capable of mini-runs and bursts of points, but neither team could really put it out of reach. It just so happens that Kansas' last run caught them up at the end of regulation, and carried them through over time.
Getting too long-winded, but I feel like all the scrutiny over timeouts or foul shots are misguided. Like bloke said, the game was not decided with one or two calls...
What do I know, just a biased Jayhawk fan.
I thought that last night's game was amazing. Really evenly matched teams. Both of them were capable of mini-runs and bursts of points, but neither team could really put it out of reach. It just so happens that Kansas' last run caught them up at the end of regulation, and carried them through over time.
Getting too long-winded, but I feel like all the scrutiny over timeouts or foul shots are misguided. Like bloke said, the game was not decided with one or two calls...
What do I know, just a biased Jayhawk fan.