Page 1 of 1
Re: substitutes for Real and QuickTime
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:38 am
by ojannen2
Re: substitutes for Real and QuickTime
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:04 pm
by tubafatness
For general video needs, I use the VLC Media Player. It seems to play nearly everything.
Re: substitutes for Real and QuickTime
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:51 pm
by MartyNeilan
There is a reason for all those updates to Adobe. many of them are to fix security holes that could be exploited by malicious software. There was a big front-page update for Adobe about two years ago for a very critical issue.
Updates in and of themselves are not a bad thing.
I will agree that Quicktime is extremely annoying and I avoid it like the plague. This is one instance where Windows Media Player is actually the friendlier product.
Re: substitutes for Real and QuickTime
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:02 pm
by TubaTodd
tubafatness wrote:For general video needs, I use the VLC Media Player. It seems to play nearly everything.
+1 for VLC
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
Here are the codecs it supports
Screenshot.jpg
I have no idea if it will work 100% for either format, but it does a very good job.
Re: substitutes for Real and QuickTime
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:16 pm
by The Jackson
I give another big plus for VLC. There are a small handful of Real-only formats, but VLC will take care of everything else. It's slim and bare-bones (no fancy crap, just the player).