Reasonable digression in the Classroom?
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:47 pm
Disclaimer: This post will be a rant that refers to political events. However, the issue eat stake is not the said events.
So I went to one of my graduate seminar classes yesterday, a Music Since 1945 class. The prof (He's tenured) is usually quite eccentric and eclectic in his approach to the subject matter. Just to give an idea of what I mean, after listening to a certain piece he turned to us and said: "This piece is a glimpse of the universe" in a very solemn tone.
So, yesterday in class, he decided to show some John Cage, and start talking about "Order" and "Chaos" in music and after about 2 minutes he went off on a tangent to start a discussion about: Canadian Politics, American politics, the health care system, Ron Paul, the state of composers nowadays, the lack of talent in orchestras...etc, He proceeded to also insult today's youth, all pop music, and a ton of other stuff...
His rant lasted 45 minutes (The lecture is 3hrs/week, divided into 2 90 minutes segments).
So my questions are as follows:
1. Has this ever happened to you?
2. How did you react? (Meet with the prof, Meet with another prof, etc...)
3. Any thoughts in general on about how much irrelevant material a prof should incorporate in a lecture?
FWIW, I felt it was a waste of time in class. I do think that socio-historical context can provide a certain backdrop for a lecture, but I fail to see the connection/or lack of between John Cage's Music and the policies of Ron Paul.
So I went to one of my graduate seminar classes yesterday, a Music Since 1945 class. The prof (He's tenured) is usually quite eccentric and eclectic in his approach to the subject matter. Just to give an idea of what I mean, after listening to a certain piece he turned to us and said: "This piece is a glimpse of the universe" in a very solemn tone.
So, yesterday in class, he decided to show some John Cage, and start talking about "Order" and "Chaos" in music and after about 2 minutes he went off on a tangent to start a discussion about: Canadian Politics, American politics, the health care system, Ron Paul, the state of composers nowadays, the lack of talent in orchestras...etc, He proceeded to also insult today's youth, all pop music, and a ton of other stuff...
His rant lasted 45 minutes (The lecture is 3hrs/week, divided into 2 90 minutes segments).
So my questions are as follows:
1. Has this ever happened to you?
2. How did you react? (Meet with the prof, Meet with another prof, etc...)
3. Any thoughts in general on about how much irrelevant material a prof should incorporate in a lecture?
FWIW, I felt it was a waste of time in class. I do think that socio-historical context can provide a certain backdrop for a lecture, but I fail to see the connection/or lack of between John Cage's Music and the policies of Ron Paul.