Page 1 of 1

perantucci numbers new=old

Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:33 pm
by Whammo
Does anyone know what the new number equivalent is for an old PT 2?

Re: perantucci numbers new=old

Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:29 pm
by JB
Whammo wrote:Does anyone know what the new number equivalent is for an old PT 2?
32

PT mp “New” vs. “Old” numbers

A recent question asked about Perantucci mp numbers (old and their new equivalent); the reference list below was compiled from the time of that changeover (c. 1990), so it does not include mp’s added since that time.


American-style Funnel-shaped cups
New #…………Old #
PT-30…………3
PT-31…………12
PT-32…………2
PT-34…………21
PT-36…………1
PT-38…………1-S
PT-44…………new (released 1990)
PT-48…………new (released 1990)
PT-50…………20

German-style Rounded-cup mouthpieces
PT-60…………8-S
PT-62…………8
PT-64…………9
PT-66…………19
PT-68…………7
PT-70…………7**
PT-72…………25-S
PT-80…………17
PT-82…………23
PT-83…………26
PT-84…………25
PT-86…………0
PT-88…………10

Baritone/Euphonium Mouthpieces
PT-2…………4
PT-3…………3
PT-4…………2

Re: perantucci numbers new=old

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:51 am
by iiipopes
JB wrote:
Whammo wrote:Does anyone know what the new number equivalent is for an old PT 2?
32

PT mp “New” vs. “Old” numbers

A recent question asked about Perantucci mp numbers (old and their new equivalent); the reference list below was compiled from the time of that changeover (c. 1990), so it does not include mp’s added since that time.


American-style Funnel-shaped cups
New #…………Old #
PT-30…………3
PT-31…………12
PT-32…………2
PT-34…………21
PT-36…………1
PT-38…………1-S
PT-44…………new (released 1990)
PT-48…………new (released 1990)
PT-50…………20

German-style Rounded-cup mouthpieces
PT-60…………8-S
PT-62…………8
PT-64…………9
PT-66…………19
PT-68…………7
PT-70…………7**
PT-72…………25-S
PT-80…………17
PT-82…………23
PT-83…………26
PT-84…………25
PT-86…………0
PT-88…………10

Baritone/Euphonium Mouthpieces
PT-2…………4
PT-3…………3
PT-4…………2
That absolutely needs to be a "sticky" for reference on the forum. Thanks.

Re: perantucci numbers new=old

Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:15 am
by UTSAtuba
iiipopes wrote:That absolutely needs to be a "sticky" for reference on the forum. Thanks.
Absolutely agreed. Or, at least on the "Tips" section of this site.