MikeMason wrote:I was disappointed with the ending to your story. I just knew little Johnny and his parents turned their nose up to it,told grandma you had robbed her,and reported you to the bbb

MikeMason wrote:I was disappointed with the ending to your story. I just knew little Johnny and his parents turned their nose up to it,told grandma you had robbed her,and reported you to the bbb
You forgot the before shots to show just how bad off it was.bloke wrote: solder joints? - a little messy...wiped clean/solid
dent removal? - "good enough"
finish? - "Ha!"
replaced corks/felts? - They didn't need it. :|
Just like "not all playing gigs", "not all repair gigs" are "things about which to post on the web"...just as this was not. :P
I sure wish "budget jobs" were done more often in all areas.Lee Stofer wrote:I would not refer to your work here as doing a "crappy" job, but doing a budget job.
They do indeed. I brought my 787 to rehearsal the last time The Section had Alternate Tuba Night (MW32, 787, Piggy instead of the three Alexanders). It astonished everyone, including me- we all thought no one would hear it. Of course, with those horns we weren't anywhere near as powerful as with the Alexanders, and it was a bit harder to get our intonation squared away, but that little tuba's output was a pleasant surprise. AFAIK there was never a 4-valve version- that would have been interesting.bloke wrote:What I "like" about them is the way that they pack a punch with a 13" bell ("secret" = full-size .689" bore...but nothing more than "economy of parts"...same tubing they use[d] on their comp.-Eb's).
I have a good newer Besson molded plastic case which fits my Besson 2-20 BBb. The horn is 31½" tall. I could sell this case.Biggs wrote: do you have another case of similar size and condition, to perform the exact same function as this one, that you would part with for the right sum?