Page 28 of 28

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 6:27 pm
by iiipopes
lowtones425 wrote:I'd like to see a modernized 186 in CC (with the usual 5 rotor valves). Emphasis on the vertical tuning slide. It's a pet peeve of mine with Miraphones in general.
I absolutely disagree. I find horizontal tuning slides much easier to work, especially "on the fly," as necessary in ensemble.

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:48 pm
by Wyvern
Doc wrote:Jonathan, Steve, Chuck, et al...

Does the B50 gig bag fit the Kaiser? I would like to find a more substantial bag than my current bag for my B&S Kaiser (same basic dimensions as the Wessex Kaiser). My current bag is an ancient Mirafone canvas bag with no padding at all.

Thanks,

Bill
The B50 gig bag is not large enough, but we have new B690 bags coming in later this year which will be custom made for the Kaiser

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 7:38 pm
by Kevbach25
Weird for a tuba forum as well as lengthy, but...

An alto (tenor) horn with a larger bore than cornets and tapered accordingly for the larger bore. I'm thinking around .485"-.500". Cornets and baritone horns seem to be growing in size while the tenor horn is not. Why this is could be left for a separate discussion.

The main idea of this is there should be more separation between cornet and alto horn, and less between alto and baritone horns.

If we're taking this to the extreme, however...

The return of the compensating tenor horn. I've seen one online (a Boosey if memory serves, may have been a Besson) and I thought it was the coolest alto/tenor horn I had ever seen.

Specs could be .500" bore, bottom-sprung compensating valves, ~8" bell, wrapped more like the Geneva tenor horns that have a straighter leadpipe.

I'm not saying this should be done, but I think it would be a nice change in a market that, honestly, appears to be somewhat stagnant as far as design is concerned. They're all too similar!

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 2:02 pm
by Innocent Bystander
So, what can we actually expect to see this year then?

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 5:31 pm
by Wyvern
A new alto horn is planned, and possibly compensated. I can’t see why the compensating system has to stop with the baritone - intonation is equally important for the higher brass.

For planned new releases in 2020, these include;

- Monster Eb, both front piston and top valve compensated
- 4/4 rotary BBb
- CC/BBb cimbasso
- Front piston version of the British F
- French saxhorn in Bb
- Another new euphonium
- Tenor tuba

And an exciting new 6/4 tuba unlike anything currently available possibly too :)

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:33 pm
by Wyvern
Mark Finley wrote:how many of those are going to be at the army workshop or TMEA?
None, those are developments for 2020. What you have not seen before will be the new front piston F in both versions (17” and 15” bell improved over ITEC prototype), the new Leviathan 6/4 compensated BBb (lightweight and heavyweight versions), the British F (with improved intonation over prototype) the EP600 Sinfônica euphonium (first production), the 5-valve Kaiser and the CC Helicon.

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:49 pm
by bort
Wyvern wrote:And an exciting new 6/4 tuba unlike anything currently available possibly too :)
A rotary 6/4 in the style of a Neptune?

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 4:20 pm
by DouglasJB
Wyvern wrote:And an exciting new 6/4 tuba unlike anything currently available possibly too :)
Could this the 6/4 Eb Bat possibly?

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:14 pm
by EmptyCase
I would like to see something that resembles a piston 6/4 BBb recording tuba. Like a Conn 36j tuba.

Or if you really want to go crazy... something that resembles a piston valve version of the monstrous king pit tuba. :mrgreen:

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 12:56 am
by Ltrain
What (specifically) is going on with the Eb Sousaphone?

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 2:00 am
by Wyvern
Ltrain wrote:What (specifically) is going on with the Eb Sousaphone?
We are changing tapers to improve intonation

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:14 pm
by Ltrain
Wyvern wrote:
Ltrain wrote:What (specifically) is going on with the Eb Sousaphone?
We are changing tapers to improve intonation
ETA for the redesign? / Does the Eb Helicon have the same intonation issues?

Bonus question: do you have a release date for the CC helicon?

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:45 am
by Wyvern
Ltrain wrote:
Wyvern wrote:
Ltrain wrote:What (specifically) is going on with the Eb Sousaphone?
We are changing tapers to improve intonation
ETA for the redesign? / Does the Eb Helicon have the same intonation issues?

Bonus question: do you have a release date for the CC helicon?
No, the Eb helicon is unaffected. It was through the Eb helicon the problem was found, because it played so much better, we started investigating why. I don’t have ETA for updated model at present.

The CC Helicon has now been approved by its designer, Carl Kleinsteuber, so will be out in the Summer - I would gestimate July.

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 2:38 pm
by sungfw
How about a 14.2mm bore/279mm bell (.560"/11") 3+1 compensating euph, with an optional main slide tuning trigger?

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 4:43 pm
by Wyvern
sungfw wrote:How about a 14.2mm bore/279mm bell (.560"/11") 3+1 compensating euph, with an optional main slide tuning trigger?
Not exactly this, but there is another new euphonium due out 2020

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:53 am
by Wyvern
Doc wrote:Jonathan, I haven’t gone through all these pages to determine if you said there might me a rotary 3/4 CC (PT3, PT4) in the works sometime. Anything like that in the works?
That is not in development at present. To be honest, rotary CC do not seem very popular, which is why I have not released anything based on my Neptune. Not saying will never happen, but not a priority.

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2020 11:32 am
by olaness1
If you came out with a rotary compensating Eb and/or Eb, I'd be all over it.

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sun May 17, 2020 4:42 pm
by Ltrain
The rotors would need to be twice the height (and weight) of normal rotors. Wessex’s machining capabilities aside, would you really want to play a horn with requires heavier than normal springs and linkages to move these XL rotors?

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Sun May 17, 2020 8:16 pm
by iiipopes
olaness1 wrote:If you came out with a rotary compensating Eb and/or Eb, I'd be all over it.
Hirsbrunner made a BBb 3-valve comp rotor; it didn't sell well. I sent an email to them years ago, and then they said they still had the tooling, a new tuba would cost me $25,000.
HB BBb Comp.jpg

Re: Wessex Tubas - what would you like?

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:42 am
by 2ba4t
Thank you former previous responses by email.

Corona and other factors forced us to emigrate earlier than planned so nobody will have to waste time on me in Andover. I am an expat. However, I see that you have this 'suggestions' thread on tubenet. So I am posting this there and sending you a copy. But this may not exactly be the right time ...

Before making suggestions I decided actually to carry out my own ideas as far as possible before anything else:

Multi-tuba. The crook's way out.

As we all know the bread and butter range includes many notes an octave below the bass clef. Eb and F tubas need extra valves for these and they do not really ring out without much effort. This is why John Fletcher did the unthinkable and used first an EEb and then the 'impossible' CC.

However, the USA fashion of vast organ-like CC and BBb tubas creates a very distinct, huge, different tuba voice - which OK many love. So do I. But we can't pretend that it blends with the bones. And, in a world rapidly returning to authenticity and narrower bore instruments throughout, it ain't authentic at all. It is like using a string bass in a string quartet. Cverney's 1845 CC patent was big bore but had a narrow exponential bell. The di-radial, sousa bells we all have today make a completely different sound. Sumptuous, egomaniacal but entirely different from the cimbasso-type sound that was in the heads of many composers 1850 - 1940.

I experimented by adding straight tubing on my EEb 983 and converting it into a CC(!!!). Sorry to report - it worked beautifully. The low register leaps out and rumbles and is pretty close to a real CC. I added removable slides to the general tuning slide so if I started with Le Corsair, then Prokofiev Symphony XXX and the encore was Dvorak Scherzo I could simply easily put in and remove the CC crook. Yes the 2nd valve and compensating back 3rd slide also need crooks.

Emboldened I just did this to a Jinbao six valve F copy of XXX - a recent one that blows superbly. Sorry again. It works excellently as a mini CC.

Obviously I also made an Eb crook for my Cverney F and it worked so well that I immediately sold my Cverney Eb! I have yet to cobble together one for the Jinbao 6v F.Adding enough for an F to BBb conversion compromises the 6,7,8th partials as you might expect. [But if that piece does not use them - why not?]

5th valve.
I spent time with a calculator and then built [for Eb]  a 73 cms 5th valve. This was far more in tune than the compensating system. I made it as a dependant valve within a Cverney F 4th valve and, lengthened it for my Cverney Eb. But now I have improved on that by making an independent 5th a full tritone. This means you have a cracking full one valve [for Eb] EE and AAA AND masses of fingering to play all the way down in tune and have a full 'pedal' EEEb by using all the valves. You can now trill between EEEb and EEE - a commonly needed attribute. Yes, obviated by my previous EEb to CC crook.

4th valve accessibility on huge right-hand bell tubas and Pinky problems on continental line up tubas.


ONE: If there is a left valve, I swap the left hand valve length so that I have my '4th' valve length on my left hand to be better able to play rapid stuff. The right hand old '4th' valve then can be 73 cms or of course a tritone. I find this far niftier - like the good old 3 + 1 B&H comps on which we were dragged up

TWO: In extremis, I re-direct the linkage of the standard 1,2,3,4 line up so that the 4th valve is now operated by the left hand. This means mounting a left-hand paddle far north. The best place is often for the left thumb at the back of the instrument. Unfortunately, you need a sky-hook to sit it on. Lots of iron mongery.

Recording bells

John was getting really interested in forward-pointing bells - and 45% - when he was taken away from us. I think you should have that option on all instruments.

Plastic

We discussed plastic tubas, even back then. However we know that plastic valves stick due to expansion [Hisrchbrunner]  - but carbon fibre etc [or newer material] valves and a plastic, shiny finish plastin tuba seems inevitable (sorry, yall). These were piloted with brass valve sections as you know fifty years back.

Serpents

I greatly enjoyed playing a George III serpent that Anthony Baines kindly lent me from the Bate Collection in the Oxford 'Bate Band' and performing a Galliard sackbut suite on it. This was only 50 years back. Since then I have been determined to get a serpent made which was fully keyed. It has an ethereal and haunting sound as you know. Go on. You make ophicleides. Use plastic.

Again, as ever in homage to the one person who has contributed most ever to our tuba world in practical terms. [OK with Sachs and Weiprecht and Cverney] I love the thought of a resurrected British F tuba. I remember that of my teacher and mentor, Arthur Doyle.