Why use an F tuba?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

JCradler wrote:Rick,
Have you played the Norwegian Star? If one is looking for something to blend with trombones(other than a cuisinart...) this may be it. Unlike any other Eb that I have played, in a good way.
Funny how we're usually seeking to blend with this or balance that. Do you think other instrumentalists are concerned about how their axes will behave with the tuba? Has this ever been a 2-way street?
:?
I've played a couple of the Miraphone Eb's, but not the new one. I'm already set in my ways, and can barely manage my current two sets of fingerings (with variations for each instrument).

No, I've never met anyone who cares whether they blend with the tuba. I can't even get them to tune to the tuba.

Rick "thinking tuba players are even more into sound than other instrumentalists" Denney
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: Why use an F tuba?

Post by Rick Denney »

joebob wrote:It seems the real questions are: What do all/most Eb tubas have in common and what do all/most F tubas have in common?
The problem is that you won't identify what makes Eb different from F per se, but rather what makes current Eb tubas different from current F tubas. There are many Bb/C pairs of contrabass tubas that are very similar and made from the same general plan, but very few Eb/F pairs that are made from the same plan. Willson is an exception with their 3200 F and 3400 Eb, and Miraphone may be a bit of an exception with the Norwegian Star Eb and 281 F, which are at least on the same planet, but for the most part, F's have followed a separate developmental tradition than Eb's.

Thus, I think it's easier to make the case that the differences between Bb and C are subtle at best while the differences between Eb and F tubas currently on the market are more pronounced. But the difference is not a function of the extra bit of tubing so much as it is a function of the design objectives.

Rick "who likes barkier sound of most F's" Denney
djwesp
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:01 pm

stirring the pot

Post by djwesp »

I'll throw this out there...

(I'm an Eb player and F)


I think that most of the rationale in application towards the F is that orchestra pieces facilitate its tuning moreso than an Eb.


Orchestral parts are generally sharp keys (to facilitate stringed instruments) and the F is more capable of handling this than the Eb while keeping intonation issues to a minimum.

Before this starts an argument of, "why ain't there beein no G horns than"... I look to the argument of traditionalism and heritage in instrument production.
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Post by GC »

I seem to rememer a post that talked about Roger Bobo's D and G tubas.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
circusboy
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 670
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: City of Angels

Post by circusboy »

I learned to play on an Eb. Then I came into a situation where I was living in a very small space and traveling constantly; I needed a physically smaller horn.

I ended up buying a small F--mostly for its size.

I learned the fingerings.

Then something magical happened. I heard its sound--I mean really heard that F tuba sound--and fell in love with it.

I'm currently shopping for a replacement for this horn, because I think I can find something easier to play (especially re: intonation). Though my situation has changed, I still want something smaller. But regardless of that, I'm so smitten by the F sound that I can't imagine buying something else.
UDELBR
Deletedaccounts
Deletedaccounts
Posts: 1567
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:07 am

Post by UDELBR »

circusboy wrote:Then something magical happened. I heard its sound--I mean really heard that F tuba sound--and fell in love with it.
I identified with what you wrote here. My large Eb reminds me alot of my own voice. I think that's why I've got such a soft spot for it (that, and sonority, and resonance, and...).

They say that African craftsmen will only make kalimbas (thumb-pianos) for folks, using that person's own vocal range, thus reflecting their own inherent 'musicality'. I'd like to think there's a parallel there.
Mark E. Chachich
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Mark E. Chachich »

I learned F tuba while in college. Unlike many people, I could deal with the intonation and did not have any serious issues with the low range on an F tuba. I liked and still like the sound of a F tuba especially the Alexanders. However, when it came time to buy, I bought an E flat York Monster.

Why did I buy an E flat?
a.) I wanted a bass tuba, I reasoned that this tuba was good, could do
what I needed with a bass tuba and in the future I would get an F.
b.) E flats were cheaper then F tubas and in 1978 old E flats were
really cheap because most tubists did not want them.
c.) the reason that I spent the money was that the tuba was good, had a
really nice sound, had intonation that I could live with and was
responsive throught the registers when I played it. The bottom line
was that it worked for me. The fact that I could afford a tuba that
worked for me was a very nice side benifit.

Why did I keep the E flat?
a.) I like the sound
b.) it did (and still does) what I need a bass tuba to do
c.) I changed from music to scientific research as a carreer. I no longer
needed a bass tuba for auditions, jobs, etc... In fact, I can play
whatever I like because I no longer am attempting to play the tuba for
a living, I play the tuba for my pleasure.

I like the sound of a good F tuba and the blend with a trombone section, the sound quality is (to me) closer to the trombone section. I really enjoy the F in Romanian and German orchestras.

To me, the E flat has a different sound (not better or worse, perhaps rounder and more bass like). I like the E flat sound as much as the F sound. I really enjoy the E flat tubas in British orchestras and brass bands.

I would have been as happy with an F as an E flat.

Mark
Mark E. Chachich, Ph.D.
Principal Tuba, Bel Air Community Band
Life Member, Musicians' Association of Metropolitan Baltimore, A.F.M., Local 40-543
Life Member, ITEA
User avatar
Steve Inman
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:48 am

Post by Steve Inman »

I am an amateur tubist who has played both F and Eb over the years (never at the same time). As a typical US school kid, I started with BBb. As an adult amateur, I ended switching to Eb (Besson 983) as most of my playing was for quintet, and the upper register playing was quite a bit easier for me. However when I started playing with a quartet, often trying to cover a 2nd 'bone part and wanting to play it "as written" to keep the intervals "correct", the 983 just seemed to broad in sound. I ended up switching to a smaller F tuba (first an Amati/Cerveny 6V, then later a YFB-621). These worked well with the quartet, but just weren't quite big enough for quintet (to my ears, and to the quintet's combined ears as well). Today I use a Conn 56J for larger groups and a YEB-381 5V Eb for quintet and smaller ensembles.

I'm using an Eb instead of an F because I've chosen playability (intonation and a solid mid-low register) over sound. If I could find a rotary F tuba that was big enough to put a solid bottom end on a quintet, with good intonation and a solid low C, I would save up and abandon Eb in favor of such an F, because I **REALLY LIKE** the sound of a rotary F tuba. I have yet to play the new Firebird, so perhaps there is still a chance ....

Failing this, I will probably remain an Eb player, as my YEB-381 plays well in tune and has no weenie medium-low notes. I might even some day consider becoming an Eb-only player, swapping my Conn 56J and Yamaha Eb for a larger Eb solution -- such as a Willson 3400 or MW 2141 or 2040/5. Based on Jonathantuba's assertion that the 2040 retains some of the F tuba sound characteristics, I'm interested in auditioning one sometime.

Cheers,
Steve Inman
Yamaha YEB-381 Eb
Conn 56J CC
Willson-Marzan CC Solo Model
Kokomo Chamber Brass
User avatar
DBCooper
bugler
bugler
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:36 pm
Location: Still out there

Post by DBCooper »

harold wrote:Why use an F tuba?
Because my students expect it.
Carpe filum (seize the thread!)
Chen
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 4:24 pm
Location: London

Re: Why use an F tuba?

Post by Chen »

[quote="harold"]What's the deal with this?

Is it just an American thing?

Eb seems to be good enough for everyone else and most F tubas seem to have exceptional intonation issues.

What are the clear advantages to using an F tuba?

I'll share my own experience and any pointing comment is welcome.
My first tuba was a Miraphone 181-6VGB F tuba, got it when I was 14 because my teacher played the same model (that's another issue). I also grew up admiring John Fletcher, Walter Hilgers, Michael Lind, I used to listen to these monster players everyday on my way to school. But my favorite was Fletcher. To me the sound was just more resonant and felt more open. Years ago I heard Rex Martin live, he played Hindemith sonate on a Besson Eb tuba, and I was blown away; although it was somewhat different from, I dare say, the true British feel in John Fletcher's sound. But it did remind me what wonderful sound that Eb was capable of, and was different from that of a German F's sound. Over the years I have played on quite a few F tubas on many occasions, such as Meinl Weston's 45S, 45SLP, 45SLZ, Hirsbrunner HB-8, HB-10, B&S PT-10, PT-15, Yamaha 822, 821, 621, etc. But only 2 Eb tubas: Besson 981 and 983. I hope this qualifies me to make some statements on this topic.
A few years ago I finally got myself a nice Besson 981 Eb, and I loved it. I got a Bach 24AW for it, and was immediately impressed with the British "feel" and I almost cried because of that. (well it's just me, because like I said, I am a huge John Fletcher fan) I think it's a shame that for many years Eb tubas were under-rated in the US.

Now into the topic, The difference, in my opinion, between comparably sized, Eb and F tubas with the same type of valves (piston/piston or rotary/rotary), is that Eb tuba offers a darker, more mellow sound while the F tuba plays brighter with a tiny bit more clarity, and edge. Of course that's just in general; the 45SLP plays very dark, and the 983 plays just as cleanly as any F tuba. But I think in general it is true.

No, F tubas are NOT better than Eb tubas, they are just tubas in different keys. Just like CC and BBb tuba. I think Patrick Sheridan's playing is a testiment of what Eb tubas are capable of.

I eventually got rid of the 981 because the 3+1 configuration. I'm now drooling at the 983, hope I'll find a good deal on a used one some day.

One interesting thing I didn't think much about was that, I didn't have any problem with low range on the F tuba when I first got it when I was 14, and the years after that. But when I put F away to learn CC for 3-4 months and come back to play F, I had problem with low range. I would play with double buzzing (i think it's called that).

My question for you guys: Is the F tuba designed to be paired with the BBb tuba, in other words, for players whose big tuba is keyed in BBb. I ask because the Germans still play F/BBb and they have no problem with low range, and add my own experience to that. I feel F/BBb and Eb/CC is how they are supposed to be, bold statement, I know, so fire away!

Any constructive comment is appreciated!

Have a good one now!
tubatooter1940
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2530
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: alabama gulf coast

Post by tubatooter1940 »

UncleBeer wrote:
circusboy wrote:Then something magical happened. I heard its sound--I mean really heard that F tuba sound--and fell in love with it.
I identified with what you wrote here. My large Eb reminds me alot of my own voice. I think that's why I've got such a soft spot for it (that, and sonority, and resonance, and...).

They say that African craftsmen will only make kalimbas (thumb-pianos) for folks, using that person's own vocal range, thus reflecting their own inherent 'musicality'. I'd like to think there's a parallel there.
I wish I could sing as low as my Eb King. I kept my E-Bay King because it can sing. I also chose it to match John Reno's vocal range. I like playing bass lines close to the bottom of the horn's range and to jump one octave for solos and be at or above the vocal line. A capo on the first fret of the guitar can put me in all my favorite keys.
User avatar
Z-Tuba Dude
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1329
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Lurking in the shadows of NYC!

Re: Why use an F tuba?

Post by Z-Tuba Dude »

Chen wrote:My question for you guys: Is the F tuba designed to be paired with the BBb tuba, in other words, for players whose big tuba is keyed in BBb. I ask because the Germans still play F/BBb and they have no problem with low range, and add my own experience to that. I feel F/BBb and Eb/CC is how they are supposed to be, bold statement, I know, so fire away!
I think that the problem for "American" tubists is that we were mostly brought up on contrabass tubas.

When I first approached a german F tuba, I couldn't figure out the low C thing. What I wasn't getting, coming from the contrabass perspective, is the the low C is a very low note on the F horn (discounting the pedal register), whereas it is a very comfortable, middle range note on the Bb, and C tubas. The fact that the low C has the same fingering on the Bb, and F only served to exacerbate the confusion of my instincts.

Once I learned that I needed to approach the low C, as I do the low G on my C tuba, I began to get it.
User avatar
MartyNeilan
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4876
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:06 am
Location: Practicing counting rests.

Re: Why use an F tuba?

Post by MartyNeilan »

Chen wrote: My question for you guys: Is the F tuba designed to be paired with the BBb tuba, in other words, for players whose big tuba is keyed in BBb. I ask because the Germans still play F/BBb and they have no problem with low range, and add my own experience to that.
I will postulate that BBb players have an easier time on F tuba with the low C. WHY? Because they are already used to playing that C through their v-e-r-y long 4th valve. It has a noticeably different blow to it than playing that same low C open on a C tuba. Don't believe me? Try playing a low C on two comparable contrabass tubas (aka Miraphone 186) pitched in both BBb and CC back to back. That fourth valve CC will initially have a very different feel than the open one, but the goal is to make then sound the same - the audience doesn't care how many valves you are using.
Marty "who played mostly BBb tubas when he picked up his first F."
User avatar
Steve Marcus
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1843
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:18 am
Location: Chicago area
Contact:

Post by Steve Marcus »

Harold asked:
Are there any players in a major US symphony playing an Eb?
Chen commented:
Years ago I heard Rex Martin live, he played Hindemith sonate on a Besson Eb tuba, and I was blown away;
Rex plays his Besson Eb for most orchestral applications except those that require a really big horn, in which he'll play his 5/4 Rudy CC.

Chen qualified his comment with:
although it was somewhat different from, I dare say, the true British feel in John Fletcher's sound.
Interesting, because Rex has stated that John Fletcher is one of his favorite tubists for the sound that he produced.
Steve Marcus
http://www.facebook.com/steve.marcus.88
Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

I suspect that rather than key of instrument, what this thread might be covering is type of sound, and the instruments capable of producing them:

Orchestral
Band
Solo
Quintet
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Post by MikeMason »

Doesn't Wes Jacobs in Detroit use an Eb?To me,a comp Eb sounds like a big euph, a bit bland,but nice.Good rotary Fs have a much more alive,interesting,magic sound.This really hit home to me hearing Chester Schmitz soloing with the Pensacola Symph. a few New Year's Eve concerts ago.I now own a similar instrument in pursuit of getting a little bit of that sound(mostly but not totally in vain).
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
Mark

Post by Mark »

TexTuba wrote:He does live in Washington. I'm SURE they don't have tacos as good as down here in South Texas!
You might be surprised. I will only point out that when Vincente Fox last visited the United States, his first stop was Yakima, Washington. Oh, and one more thing, 17 of the 20 most wanted by our state police are illegal aliens from south of the border.
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

harold wrote:For the most part, I can't tell the difference - especially in the hands of a good player. So, if everything else is equal, why would someone choose a bad F over a good Eb?
I think that's the issue; rarely is everything else equal!

(But if they were, I'd agree with you!) 8)
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Post Reply