I think this is the better idea.ASTuba wrote:Could you get a main tuning slide trigger installed? It may be easier and cheaper.
2nd slide kicker
-
Mark
-
ThomasP
- 3 valves

- Posts: 337
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:24 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
Tune the 3rd. valve to play E. Use it to play E. Tune the second valve to B natural. Tune the first valve to Bb. Your A should be close if it's 12, your Eb shouldn't be too far off if it's 12, but your Ab might be a little low.
This isn't that odd. I play 3rd valve in place of 12 often.
This isn't that odd. I play 3rd valve in place of 12 often.
Thomas Peacock
Huttl for life
Schilke 66
Huttl for life
Schilke 66
- imperialbari
- 6 valves

- Posts: 7461
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am
In one respect I easily can act as a saint, because that also reveals some of the less wise decisions through my long and rich-in-fun life with brass instruments:
Any brass player should have been around the trombone and possibly also around the horn. After playing these playing in tune on the other brasses is piece of cake.
In general none of my Eb and BBb basses are friendly towards instant intonation corrections by means of slide pulling. From a talk in 1990 with the present owner of Hirsbrunner (a very wise man in brass matters) I know, that the band pitch instruments in the old US tradition were set up to provide the optimal compromise of tuning, where some less optimal notes were accepted.
All slides basically were made a bit too long especially on 3 valve instruments.
1st finger F in the staff is inherently flat on an Eb instrument. The same goes for 1st finger C in the staff for BBb basses.
My take on that problem is to re-finger problematic notes, which is why I prefer 4-valve instruments.
Symphonic CC players have to lock in dead-on with the trombones and with the strings. Their tubas are set up in a different way causing at least the 1st slide being too short in most cases. But the mid-staff D has to be dead-on fingered 1.
I have a single Bb horn set up that way. In most of the range I never use the fingering of 1+2. I consequently use 3. On other instruments I use the valves like a selection of trombone positions and use whatever fingering fits into a given chord or scale.
It is terribly easy to sit on a distance of several thousands of miles and play smart-***. Still my take on the problem of the original poster would be this one (involving no rebuilding):
Pull the 2nd slide to the outer limit of, what keeps any note fingered 2 safe. Substitute 3 for 1+2. Fix anything else by pulling 1, 3, or 4.
Get the male ends of any slides chamfered/undercut.
Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
Any brass player should have been around the trombone and possibly also around the horn. After playing these playing in tune on the other brasses is piece of cake.
In general none of my Eb and BBb basses are friendly towards instant intonation corrections by means of slide pulling. From a talk in 1990 with the present owner of Hirsbrunner (a very wise man in brass matters) I know, that the band pitch instruments in the old US tradition were set up to provide the optimal compromise of tuning, where some less optimal notes were accepted.
All slides basically were made a bit too long especially on 3 valve instruments.
1st finger F in the staff is inherently flat on an Eb instrument. The same goes for 1st finger C in the staff for BBb basses.
My take on that problem is to re-finger problematic notes, which is why I prefer 4-valve instruments.
Symphonic CC players have to lock in dead-on with the trombones and with the strings. Their tubas are set up in a different way causing at least the 1st slide being too short in most cases. But the mid-staff D has to be dead-on fingered 1.
I have a single Bb horn set up that way. In most of the range I never use the fingering of 1+2. I consequently use 3. On other instruments I use the valves like a selection of trombone positions and use whatever fingering fits into a given chord or scale.
It is terribly easy to sit on a distance of several thousands of miles and play smart-***. Still my take on the problem of the original poster would be this one (involving no rebuilding):
Pull the 2nd slide to the outer limit of, what keeps any note fingered 2 safe. Substitute 3 for 1+2. Fix anything else by pulling 1, 3, or 4.
Get the male ends of any slides chamfered/undercut.
Klaus Smedegaard Bjerre
-
tubatooter1940
- 6 valves

- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: alabama gulf coast
Mr. The Elephant,the elephant wrote:Homemade, as per a design idea that Ron Bishop gave me back in 1999. He sent me some nice photos of his Alex including a homemade second slide adjuster that looked like it was easy to duplicate. I decided to try it out and came up with a quickie design that would bind less and would also be very rigid. It is very ugly, but I had not intended to leave it on the horn as it was just an experiment to see how much could be fixed on my Alex using just the second slide. Turns out to be quite a bit. Since it worked so well I just left it on my horn. The only cosmetic thing that I decided to do was to buff off the solder from the thumb ring bracket on my bell.
I have used this for seven years now. I only have to use it on certain pitches in certain situations. I use 1st quite a bit. I never have to move 3rd or 4th.
I showed your picture to my wife. She told me she loved the bedspread.
We pronounce it Guf Coast
-
Lee Stofer
- 4 valves

- Posts: 935
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 7:50 am
Of all the 2nd slide trigger arrangements I've tried, the Rudolf Meinl arrangement works best, but then it is also the most expensive, about a $750.00 option on one of his instruments. I have fabricated a couple of them, but to make one that will work right, out of really dependable materials, cost just as much for me to make, and it is a job to properly fit one into the narrow space available between the valve linkage and the 2nd valve.
Andy Smith was absolutely correct, that a main tuning slide adjuster would be a cheaper fix. But, I'd also suggest that you have the instrument carefully inspected by a competent professional, to see if there are mechanical reasons that your particular PT-6 plays that far out-of-tune. Mouthpiece choice and player's habits can make a significant difference, too.
I personally do not like main tuning slide adjusters, and have found that there are very few instruments in 100% mechanical order (valves properly aligned, dent-free, no joints leaking, valves not leaking, no water keys leaking), that cannot be played in tune without such a device. If the intonation faults are inherent in that instrument, then a main slide adjuster would be the way to go.
Andy Smith was absolutely correct, that a main tuning slide adjuster would be a cheaper fix. But, I'd also suggest that you have the instrument carefully inspected by a competent professional, to see if there are mechanical reasons that your particular PT-6 plays that far out-of-tune. Mouthpiece choice and player's habits can make a significant difference, too.
I personally do not like main tuning slide adjusters, and have found that there are very few instruments in 100% mechanical order (valves properly aligned, dent-free, no joints leaking, valves not leaking, no water keys leaking), that cannot be played in tune without such a device. If the intonation faults are inherent in that instrument, then a main slide adjuster would be the way to go.
Lee A. Stofer, Jr.
- Wyvern
- Wessex Tubas

- Posts: 5033
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
- Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
- Contact:
Here is picture. It includes adjustment, so it does not fully return if wished (as mine is set).Bob1062 wrote:the VMI rotary Culbertson/Neptune BAT has a second slide kicker that is on the left side of the instrument, just past the valve set.

As the PT-6 is of the same family, maybe your best bet would be to get one of these Neptune triggers fitted.
