Do you disagree with those basic points? To borrow from the article Joe posted, is it indeed an unreasonable person who pays an unreasonable price, especially based on a self-delusional definition of "need"?sloan wrote:Ken "thinking the point would have been made more strongly if you had stopped there" SloanRick Denney wrote:Ken, we are arguing for the sake of arguing, not for the sake of illuminating the subject at hand. Let's stop.
Do you disagree that a company is not obligated to its outside investors to charge the highest price the market (i.e., buyers) will bear?
If you think I was actually being mean by using the terms "hobbyist" and "boutique", then you are simply mistaken.
Rick "who thought it was the stuff that came after that that you disagreed with" Denney


