Chuck(G) wrote:Nowadays, robustus beans are a quaint thing of the past, but for some of the really rotgut brands. The coffee that you brew in your home is yards and miles better than what you used to be able to get. But it's just another cup of coffee all over again. It's not special.
You hit that one right through my window! Latest shipment of green coffee beans arrived via UPS 4 hrs ago, and I've already roasted a couple small batches, in a hot air popcorn popper from the '80s. I've been doing this for several years, and maybe it isn't as special as it was the first month, but ... the first batch I roasted this evening was a Brazilian dry process from an estate in the Sul de Minas area, that's described by the on-line retailer in glowing terms that could only be compared to a wine review, and over the next month or two it will be interesting to see if I can pick out any of what he's talking about (goldenseal?) Tomorrow or Saturday I will probably roast a batch of the Sidamo dry process that arrived today, also new to me but I know from experience with Ethiopian coffee that I can expect an exotic treat of some fairly bold kind - my all-time favorite was the Sidamo I used to be able to get a couple years ago that had a prominent flavor like dried apricots, though you'd really have to taste it. I don't know if I can wait until Saturday.
So, well, I see what you're saying and it makes sense to me, but I guess it depends on the person. There really are millions of people who like thin, percolater brewed "can" coffee (which I believe does contain a lot of robusta, they have a steaming process that can make an inoffensive coffee-like substance out of just about any trash.) There are plenty of people like yourself, who have opted for something better, and there are a marginal few like myself who let it kind of get out of hand.
The same people listen to music. It
is special to most of us, despite all the music we listen to. To others out there, it wouldn't be all that special even if they lived back in Sousa's day (Sousa railed against the recording industry, rightly of course), because they're just not there for music.
So I think I would have agreed, until you laid out that coffee analogy.
In my view this evening, the Renaissance was the golden age of what we loosely call classical music: not coincidentally, right at its beginning. What we loosely call classical music, we might more accurately call music of the aristocracy, because aristocratic patronage was its defining attribute. By the Renaissance, this hadn't screwed things up too much yet, hadn't had time. Today, it's no wonder music of the aristocracy is in disarray, since today's aristocracy is relatively ignorant and self-absorbed. I think there may be a case to be made, that we are ready to leave this model behind, and look for serious music in the forms of popular music as the Renaissance composers did. Education is the missing link.