2165 or Neptune

Sell and buy equipment.
Forum rules
This forum is for buying or selling your personal equipment. Sponsored selling is allowed as well. All ads are required to have the following information: Price (even for trades), brand, model, and location (City and State, for instruments, not accessories). It is acceptable to link to an external ad if you are promoting a sale of your personal equipment. No Ebay auctions, but "Buy It Now" listings are fine. Photos are HIGHLY suggested as well, and may be hosted on Google Drive, or elsewhere. If you see an ad that does not meet these criteria, please report it.
Post Reply
User avatar
TexTuba
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1424
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:01 pm

Re: 2165 or Neptune

Post by TexTuba »

strudelstuba wrote:What is better?
Meinl Weston 2165 or a VMI Neptune tuba?
What is better:

BBb or CC?
Silver or Lacquer or Raw brass?
Pistons or Rotors?

When you can answer these things, you shall have your answer. Although I tend to think THIS is best:

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/grocery ... actice.jpg

Ralph :roll:
Frank Ortega
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: New Jersey, USA

Neptune

Post by Frank Ortega »

When I played a piston Neptune a few years ago, I found the high G in the staff to be unmanageably Sharp. Otherwise, I would have bought it.
My 2 cents.
Frank Ortega
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

the elephant wrote:The 2165 is the BAT that most complain about not having much clarity when played below forte. It is hard to change the sound very much. It has little color in the tone. It is simply very BIG and DARK and hard to over blow.
One well-known player we both know suggested that the York was aimed at making the most of what the player could provide, while the 2165 was aimed at making the most of what Warren Deck could provide. That probably reinforces your description.

Some say it is a copy of a Holton. No 2165 I've played is like my Holton, at least. Mine is colorful and efficient, and maintains good clarity for a big tuba even at low dynamics.

I haven't played a 2265, but I have played a 6450. Be still my beating heart! That was a tuba that really made the most of the player, even when the player has not much to offer.

Rick "whose Bb Holton competes well with most C BATs but not the 6450" Denney
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Post by Wyvern »

Bob1062 wrote:However, to be completely honest, I liked the 1291 sound more and it seemed to have a bigger sound.
Bob, you are used to playing small tubas, so you most likely do not know how to blow a BAT. They are very different beasts!
(FWIW Big tubas like the Neptune sound best coaxed, rather than pushed)

I have only briefly tried a 2165 and did not like it at all. I have expressed my love of the Neptune more than enough on this forum, so will say no more now :wink: :lol:
User avatar
sc_curtis
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Post by sc_curtis »

Rick Denney wrote:Rick "whose Bb Holton competes well with most C BATs but not the 6450" Denney
Thats quite an endorsement, considering how we all know how you feel about your Holton. I can't wait to try it out at TMEA this year, assuming Roger brings one!
www.thetubaplayer.com

Current stable:
PT6
Meinl Weston 2250
Rudolf Meinl 3/4 CC
YFB621S
YCB621S
Custom BBb Cimbasso
Post Reply