The technique, sound and style I've always loved the most, though is Fletch. Talk about command, sound, control... Another plug for Eb
J.c.S.




To be frank, it's because there is so little truely wonderful music for the Tuba. I'll probably be flamed for it, but our instrument is too new, to ill-respected, and simply not written well fo by most composers, most of whom do not rank among the greats, or among the great show pieces writers either. Transcriptions allow us to expand our musical horizons. Jake expounded on this very point. However, if you sound like a tuba player playing Carnival, instead of a musician playing Carnival, you're doing something very wrong. It can be done right.Neptune wrote:
Why can't we be happy playing music written for the tuba, rather than trying to compete with other instruments in a work for which the tuba is really not at its best? Such pieces as Carnival played on tuba are I think mainly to impress other tuba players, rather than a true musical expression. Other musicians are at best impressed with the skill, but more often just amused at the result in comparison to the original instrumentation. However for doing what it was intended, providing the bass to support the ensemble, the tuba is supreme!

I'm not trying to be overly critical, but in my opinion, I'd like to both sound like a tuba player and like a musician when I play. I am always working toward that goal.J.c. Sherman wrote: However, if you sound like a tuba player playing Carnival, instead of a musician playing Carnival, you're doing something very wrong. It can be done right.
J.c.S.

That's the best thing I've ever heard.Rick Denney wrote:A good sound is not necessarily a beautiful sound. A good sound is one that communicates the intentions of the performer.


I don't think the issue was whether we did or did not sound like a tuba. I think the issue was whether the tuba sound told the story as effectively. Clearly, the Baadsvik Carnival was well played and it told a story. But it lacked much of the nuance of the Marsalis version on cornet. The question is whether the difference is attributable to the instrument or the performer. In this case, that's not easy to answer at all.eupher61 wrote:how can you NOT sound like a tuba player when playing tuba?



I would purchase a CD of good music played on a kazoo LONG before I would purchase a CD of the most exquisitely played 1/2 hour series of whole notes - all the same pitch.gjones7777 wrote:If the playing is excellent and the sound sucks.........then the performance sucks.
Disagree?
Try giving a recital on a kazoo! Even IF you "play" every note correctly, ya really think anyone will buy the CD?


Rod The Mod may have recorded it but it's a Joan Baez tune. Don't ask me how I know. It's a long story and maybe I'll tell it at Blokestock. After the horn testing, scotch drinking and gun shooting. Not before.Greg wrote:Uh....wasn't rod Stewart Forever Young?gjones7777 wrote:yeah yeah.......and Rod Stewart's voice was "sandpaper on a blackboard" smooth.
But he was crazy and sexy and blonde in his youth..........and.........oh yes........wasn't playing tuba.

I would express the same point but in a different way. For me, the music is everything. Anything that is conspicuous other than the music detracts from it. I have heard performances where missed notes did not detract from the music, and where the music was supported by a sound that would not pass muster in any orchestral situation.sloan wrote:All performances are a mixture of:
a) play the instrument
b) play the notes
c) play the music
If you fall below theshold on any of these, the performance is a failure.