"Old" "Funnel" vs "New" "Heritage Wick 1 Mouthpiece

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

"Old" "Funnel" vs "New" "Heritage Wick 1 Mouthpiece

Post by iiipopes »

Has anybody out there compared the "Old" "Funnel" Wick 1 mouthpiece with the "New" "Heritage" Wick 1 mouthpiece?
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
tofu
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: One toke over the line...

Re: "Old" "Funnel" vs "New" "Heritage Wick 1 Mouthpiece

Post by tofu »

:tuba:
Last edited by tofu on Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
euphomate
bugler
bugler
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:34 am
Location: Australia

Re: "Old" "Funnel" vs "New" "Heritage Wick 1 Mouthpiece

Post by euphomate »

I regularly use Wick 3L tuba mouthpieces in an Eb Sovereign & a Willson 3400. I alternate between one of the older "funnel" design & one of the new "Heritage" styles. I can detect no difference at all in tone, intonation, sound level, "feel" or comfort. I have even carried out a blind test with the wife's assistance in order to convince myself that the newer style must be better. Once on the chops I couldn't tell which mp was in the horn. One difference makes me often choose the Heritage. Weight. If you are in the habit of keeping your mp in your trouser or jacket pocket when carrying the horn to rehearsal or a gig, the heritage is a whole lot lighter. It won't put such a big dent in your bell when you drop it either. :D
Besson BE982 Sovereign EEb tuba
Wessex Champion EEb tuba
Stencil compensating euphonium
Post Reply