I like that eyepatch!Todd S. Malicoate wrote:
Where can one buy pre-made embouchures mounted that way?
Klaus

I like that eyepatch!Todd S. Malicoate wrote:

Best thing to do is contact the D.A. and press charges. Nice to let us know but there are a lot of other outlets where this guy can work his scam and he will continue until he hears the jail door slam.dord04 wrote:The reason I have brought this into the open is that I have had several buisnesses find me and contact me about what this guy has done to them.

Did you happen to ask whether, in your position, they would share that phone conversation in a post to TubeNet?Adam Peck wrote:They dealt with it in a different manner...by quietly spreading the word person to person.

Well, that's good and all, but this is the 21st century and Jared can go and rip off someone anywhere in the nation. Maybe you and this other tubist are a famous enough guy that anything you say will resonate around the world...but with my modest influence in the low brass world I cannot reach everyone by word of mouth...I just thought everyone should be aware...Maybe you don't care about it unless it happens to you or someone you know, but I do.Adam Peck wrote:It was a Principal Tubist in a major orchestra that I like to think of as a mentor. They told me they had read this thread on the Tubenet and that they also had been ripped off by the individual in question but they would never post these facts in a public forum like this. They dealt with it in a different manner...by quietly spreading the word person to person.
Adam Peck wrote:To the children here...please ignore my posts. I doubt you will find anything interesting in them as they are generally well thought out and congenial. To the party who suggested I not post on this subject...I will post on any subject I wish. Someday, if you have any class at all, you will realize you were out of line with your comments.
Hey Alex, hope everything is going well for ya. I am trying, maybe it's just because I'm not law savvy, but it's more difficult than it seems with this guy constantly changing phone numbers and giving me false or old addresses.Alex C wrote:Best thing to do is contact the D.A. and press charges. Nice to let us know but there are a lot of other outlets where this guy can work his scam and he will continue until he hears the jail door slam.
snufflelufigus wrote:Hell, why don't you send some MPs in a Humvee over to this guys house? No one likes to see the men in green with guns and a big truck pull up on their front lawn. Seems to me if we can send 140,000 troops (after the surge) to Iraq we can get 2 guys in a Humvee to pick up a horn. You should talk to your batallion S2 and see if they can hook you up with someone in Military Intelligence. They could at least make this guy's life miserable... in a fun kind of way. Remember kids, revenge is best served cold.

Well, to respectfully disagree it is both: developed over the centuries and bestowed by common law on all of us, and there to be demanded by any particular person accused that it be observed and followed at trial. See,"Beyond Reasonable Doubt" and "Probable Cause," Historical Perspectives on the Anglo-American Law of Evidence, by Barbara J. Shapiro, University of California Press, © 1991 The Regents of the University of California.Rick Denney wrote:Rick "thinking the benefit of the doubt can only be bestowed, not demanded" Denney


I'll take this little matter of semantics only one step: The fact that the benefit of the doubt had to be developed in common law and then codified is evidence that it can only be bestowed. In is the law that is doing the bestowing, as you rightly say. But I won't argue whether those barons who forced the king to sign the Magna Carta (and other early instruments of the rule of law) were demanding or bestowing. One can demand the right of way, but might get a bent fender in the process.iiipopes wrote:Well, to respectfully disagree it is both: developed over the centuries and bestowed by common law on all of us, and there to be demanded by any particular person accused that it be observed and followed at trial.Rick Denney wrote:Rick "thinking the benefit of the doubt can only be bestowed, not demanded" Denney



Maybe. It's possible to get an anonymous phone number with a 'throw away' cell phone. You pay about $20 cash at a convenience store and then refill it with phone cards which are also bought with cash. Would someone get one of these and then publicize the number? Maybe, maybe not.cambrook wrote:I don't know how it works in the US, but if you have a phone number can't you get an address?

Back in November I was curious enough about this to review the whole body of Mr. Peck's Tubenet contributions, and I wish mine were as consistently polite, on-topic and generous. I thought he was way off base here, and likewise in the other thread you're probably thinking of, but I guess that just goes to show how easy it is to go wrong when you think you need to correct someone's wrong behavior here.The Big Ben wrote: Checked into this thread this morning because of the title. Saw Mr. Peck's postings. Different day, same Peck.

Were you napping or on vacation?bloke wrote:This is the first I've seen this thread.....

See, I get what I deserve.Adam Peck wrote: I try my best to express my thoughts responsibly and not stoop to name calling. I'd welcome any P.M.'s explaining where I went wrong. Perhaps I should just ignore the bullying and not make an issue of it. I'll have to give that some thought.
I'm sorry I lost your respect, Donn. I do try very hard to be helpful here to anyone asking for such help. Perhaps you will be kind enough to get in touch with me and tell me how I could have better handled the situation.

Whatever. Done.Adam Peck wrote: All I ask is that they leave my name out of their online thoughts.


Since you won't accept P.M.s from me and have chosen to take our differences public, I have but one thing to do:Adam Peck wrote:Lets see 4750 registered users...2 responses like that...predictable. Remember, even if you were to delete all your posts they will live on in the quote feature and elsewhere for a long time. I never post something I will be ashamed of years from now. A small few of us should keep that in mind.

bloke wrote:I've been gone for a few months...TubaTinker wrote:Were you napping or on vacation?bloke wrote:This is the first I've seen this thread........helping a friend fish his metal storage building out of the Ohio River.