Xeno Euphonium?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
J.c. Sherman
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Cleveland
Contact:

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by J.c. Sherman »

I kinda take umbrage in defense of my Yamaha 321 5v. It’s a rockin’ horn.

Euph and Tuba are for me equal. And my main tuba IS a 3+1 compensating Eb. There are obvious advantages, and in fact I see this system as MORE advantageous on a tuba which has to regularly play in the lower tessitura of its range. Unfortunately, the 3+1 isn't really socially acceptable; many conductors see (and hear with their eyes) a "band" tuba.

Both systems are great, and have different strengths. Not all people who disagree with or are not in love with 3+1 euphs are fools. And 3+1 Euphs do not sound categorically "better" than 4v Conn euphs or like instruments. They sound different, and some people like that other timbre. Personally, I feel they both have a place. But If I have to hear an entire recital on a 3+1 euph, I'll want to kill myself rather than endure the sameness and "evenness" of tone from those. I find the Conns a MUCH more flexible and interesting sound. Doesn't mean I'm right and you're wrong; I just have my preference.

My 321 is a superb horn built very well and in fantastic working order. Moreover, I've made some modifications which helped it out a bit. Does it mean it's perfect? No horn is. But It's the most flexible for me between the Big a$$ British 3+1 sound and the color of the Conns. Maybe I'll throw a Conn bell on it someday ;-)

One last point - The pinky is the worst and weakest finger to have operate a valve. More, some manufacturers have what I believe is a deluded sense that the 4th valve should be lower than the other three (put your hand flat on a table and raise only your ring finger... now raise everything except your pinky and try raising your ring finger :-)). But it doesn't make it a stupid idea - it has some serious benefits, but mostly those fold into tuning with the left hand. We can now do that on Euphs with our thumbs (or on any FA Wilson/Marzan), but the expert musicians mentioned earlier didn't have those mechanisms (truly, you don't need them; just listen to 'em).

Off my pedestal, so that someone can tell me how much I suck :-)

J.c.S.
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium, Cleveland State University
Principal Tuba, Firelands Symphony Orchestra
President, Variations in Brass
http://www.jcsherman.net
User avatar
druby
bugler
bugler
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:11 pm

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by druby »

J.c. Sherman wrote:....But If I have to hear an entire recital on a 3+1 euph, I'll want to kill myself rather than endure the sameness and "evenness" of tone from those. I find the Conns a MUCH more flexible and interesting sound. Doesn't mean I'm right and you're wrong; I just have my preference....

My 321 is a superb horn built very well and in fantastic working order. Moreover, I've made some modifications which helped it out a bit. Does it mean it's perfect? No horn is. But It's the most flexible for me between the Big a$$ British 3+1 sound and the color of the Conns. Maybe I'll throw a Conn bell on it someday ;-)

Off my pedestal, so that someone can tell me how much I suck :-)

J.c.S.
J.c.S. - you don't suck, but as a 47-year veteran and student of euphonium, I get pretty peeved when some people on this forum and at least one other (particularly those supposed experts advising young high school or college students trying to make a choice of their first quality euphonium) start denigrating the 3+1 compensators. Even though I sat at the footsteps of Bill Bell, Arnold Jacobs, and Harvey Phillips at Gunnison music camp when I was 9 years old, I don't ever purport to be an expert on tuba. I do try to keep learning by reading comments on these boards and try to udnerstand what tubists feel is important. I wish some of the tubists would listen when it comes time to discuss euphoniums.

Regarding a few of your points:

1) w.r.t. a recital on a 3+1...you must not have heard Jamie Lipton play a recital. I have never heard ANY euphoniumist get such a wide variety of sound as Jamie does on her 3+1 Willson using a BB1 (a combo that is not my personal fav). Any good euphoniumist should follow her though process. She asks: "What is the right sound for the music I am playing" rather than "what is the right sound for the instrument I am playing". Thus, she (and others) will adjust her/his sound to match mood, style, etc.of the performance. Jamie happens to do this better than any other professional euphist I have ever met.

2) I am glad you happen to have a wonderful Yamaha 321 that has been modified to fit your needs. I love playing the Yamaha 321's and I recommend that horn all of the time to anyone who is on a budget that does not allow for a professional horn. I am not knocking your horn, but it also is not the horn that I can purchase from Yamaha.

3) w.r.t. sound of the classic Conn 4-valve American-style baritones (we only call them euphoniums in retrospect). I agree with you. The Conn horn (24I/25I for example) sounds different from what has become the norm of the larger "British Brass Band" sound. It is much more focused, lyrical, and quite sweet. Not a whole lot of people know how to get a professional-quality sound out of that instrument since they tend to play too large of a mouthpiece and blow "too large". The Conn's don't resonate well and they play quite increasingly flat as you go up in range if you use too large a MPC (such as a big Wick for example).

Falcone played a MPC that was roughly the equivalent of a Bach 12 when he did his famous Golden Crest recordings at Michigan State. Earle Louder started on Conn's and played a Bach 13(!) when he joined the Navy Band in the late 50's (even though he played a Besson). The sound and style of the American baritone player (I were one of those, and a good one too!) just didn't persevere in the face of the heavier, more powerful British sound. Thus, for all intents an purposes the best of these horns became obsolete and Conn went out of the euphonium/baritone business in 1970 when they ceased production of the Elkhart horns. The later horns tended to be rebadged Kings, who are now the only manufacturer of an American style horn.

Doug

P.S. I just sent my 75 year-old Pan-American (CONN) 3 valve to Charley Brighton in England so he could have a nice American horn in his recital collection. Also, I suggested to Robert Childs this summer that I ought to bring my Conn to the IBBSS in England next year and play an old H.L.Clarke solo so that the "Brit's" could hear what a classic period American horn would have sounded like. He was enthusiastic and suggested that If I do, he would pull out his Conn double-bell and we we could work up a duet together. That'd be cool, eh?
oldbandnerd
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1031
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:43 pm
Location: No matter where you go... there you are .
Contact:

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by oldbandnerd »

Doug Ruby and his 75 year old Conn Pan-American baritone :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQYJuz1XlyI" target="_blank

Sounds nice to me .
Image
sungfw
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: RTP, nc

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by sungfw »

J.c. Sherman wrote:One last point - The pinky is the worst and weakest finger to have operate a valve.
Which is precisely why the 3+1 setup, whether compensating or not, is preferable to the 4-inline arrangement.
Jesse Brook
bugler
bugler
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Stettler, AB

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by Jesse Brook »

What I meant in my earlier post, about the 842 being as good as Yamaha could be, is a comment based on what Yamaha says. I have no money, so I have not tried one. But Yamaha seems to believe that the 842 is as deluxe as they need to be. I wouldn't mind if they added a different high model, but I don't see too many companies doing 5-valve euphoniums these days, and that's what I would like to see them do. There's a non-restrictive (air-flow) alternative to compensation not many euphonium manufacturers have taken into consideration.
Any time at all is tuba time. Watch for the signs.
User avatar
David Richoux
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1957
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:52 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, mostly. Also Greater Seattle at times.

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by David Richoux »

JTJ wrote:Yeah, it's sort of like the Loch Ness monster, there but no one has seen it.

I even read on some Australian brass board that someone down under was testing a Xeno euph prototype with a trigger.

Who knows.
Xena field testing in Australia?
Xeno-Euph.jpg
...sorry... guess I didn't read that right.
Last edited by David Richoux on Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
peter birch
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 553
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: uk

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by peter birch »

I have also heard rumours of a Xeno EEb tuba...
Besson is rumoured to be developing a Prestige tuba, based on the 980, with a 17" bell, and a tuning slide trigger.
courtois 181 EEb
PT24+
User avatar
sloan
On Ice
On Ice
Posts: 1827
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:34 pm
Location: Nutley, NJ

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by sloan »

I've heard that Yamaha moves halfway towards releasing the Xeno every day.
Kenneth Sloan
User avatar
David Richoux
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1957
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:52 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, mostly. Also Greater Seattle at times.

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by David Richoux »

sloan wrote:I've heard that Yamaha moves halfway towards releasing the Xeno every day.
Zeno of Elea! (having worked in my day job as an Industrial Designer for way too long, I know the feeling...)
User avatar
AndyCat
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 484
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:11 am
Location: Preston, UK
Contact:

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by AndyCat »

peter birch wrote:I have also heard rumours of a Xeno EEb tuba...
Besson is rumoured to be developing a Prestige tuba, based on the 980, with a 17" bell, and a tuning slide trigger.
The rumour is a Xeno BBb, Simon Gresswell has the prototype.
Andy Cattanach, UK
Fodens Band, Intrada Brass Ensemble.
Yamaha Neo BBb x 2 (2011 and 2016), B+H 3v Imperial BBb.
Yamaha YBL613H Bass Trombone.
Mercer and Barker MB5 Cattanach, Yeo Signature Mouthpieces.
User avatar
imperialbari
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 7461
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by imperialbari »

What are the special Xeno features?

According to this muscular young lady
Image
it would be 4 non-compensating top pistons and a detachable inside-the-bell garland with a ying-yang style stay (for mounting a clip-on microphone?).

Odd.

Klaus
ParLawGod
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:37 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Xeno Euphonium?

Post by ParLawGod »

I vote for adding the word "Xeno" to the model 842... :lol:
Post Reply