Zoom recorder vs. competitors
-
ASRtalks
- lurker

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:24 pm
Zoom recorder vs. competitors
I have a lot of friends that use the Zoom H2 and H4 devices to record their playing. Just curious if people are using other devices to record their playing. The Zoom is a wonderful device, but it is pricy. Any suggestions?
Aaron
Aaron
- JHardisk
- pro musician

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 7:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
I just did my homework on this subject. The best bang for my buck came with a Yamaha Pocketrak CX. I don't need the pre-amp of the H4, as the quality is better with a small mixing board.
The Yamaha is smaller, more portable, VERY user friendly, has better internal mics, utilizes mini-SD technology, contains an eneloop battery which lasts up to 55 hours on one charge (I have recorded hours and hours of stuff and haven't charged the battery yet.), comes with Cubase AI software, and records at various sample rates.
I literally put mine in my pocket and record EVERY practice session/most rehearsals at work. Lessons are a cinch to record, and transfer is cake.
WWBW had a great price on these, and I had it shipped next day with a little help from our good friend, Roger Lewis.
There are other options I looked into as well, and if you're curious I can post those options too.
Good luck!
The Yamaha is smaller, more portable, VERY user friendly, has better internal mics, utilizes mini-SD technology, contains an eneloop battery which lasts up to 55 hours on one charge (I have recorded hours and hours of stuff and haven't charged the battery yet.), comes with Cubase AI software, and records at various sample rates.
I literally put mine in my pocket and record EVERY practice session/most rehearsals at work. Lessons are a cinch to record, and transfer is cake.
WWBW had a great price on these, and I had it shipped next day with a little help from our good friend, Roger Lewis.
There are other options I looked into as well, and if you're curious I can post those options too.
Good luck!
~John Hardisky
-
THE TUBA
- Deletedaccounts

- Posts: 706
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:54 pm
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
I have used an Edirol R-9 for the past three years and have been extremely pleased. The new version with a remote looks even more promising.
[/post]
-
rocksanddirt
- 4 valves

- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:14 pm
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
I use an H2 and really really like it. I've recorded rehearsals, and concerts; in largeish spaces and small, even outdoors and cannot fault the quality of recording.
for the $160 or so I paid, plus another $8 for a 4 gig SD card that gives me 6 hrs of CD recording, I'm really happy.
for the $160 or so I paid, plus another $8 for a 4 gig SD card that gives me 6 hrs of CD recording, I'm really happy.
- gwwilk
- 3 valves

- Posts: 448
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:06 am
- Location: Lincoln, NE
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
The best price on the Yamaha Pocketrak CX is at B&H Photo: http://tinyurl.com/c43rcnJHardisk wrote:I just did my homework on this subject. The best bang for my buck came with a Yamaha Pocketrak CX. I don't need the pre-amp of the H4, as the quality is better with a small mixing board.
The Yamaha is smaller, more portable, VERY user friendly, has better internal mics, utilizes mini-SD technology, contains an eneloop battery which lasts up to 55 hours on one charge (I have recorded hours and hours of stuff and haven't charged the battery yet.), comes with Cubase AI software, and records at various sample rates.
I literally put mine in my pocket and record EVERY practice session/most rehearsals at work. Lessons are a cinch to record, and transfer is cake.
WWBW had a great price on these, and I had it shipped next day with a little help from our good friend, Roger Lewis.
There are other options I looked into as well, and if you're curious I can post those options too.
Good luck!
Click 'Email me a better price' and you can get it for less than anywhere else.
-
pgym
- 4 valves

- Posts: 769
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
I opted for the Tascam DR-07 over the Zoom H2, Edirol 09HR, and Yamaha Pocketrax CX, and couldn't be more pleased. I found the user interface significantly more intuitive and quicker to navigate than the Zoom, Edirol, and Yamaha offerings, and easier on batteries than the Zoom and Edirol and on par with the Yamaha when using alkalines and NiMH rechargables.
The Tascam Dr-07 does NOT come with earbuds or an A/C adapter. Not a big deal in my book since I already own a better pair of earphones than the ones supplied by Zoom and Yamaha, and an A/C adapter is worthless for my purposes, but it is something that's worth noting.
Pgym.
The Tascam Dr-07 does NOT come with earbuds or an A/C adapter. Not a big deal in my book since I already own a better pair of earphones than the ones supplied by Zoom and Yamaha, and an A/C adapter is worthless for my purposes, but it is something that's worth noting.
Pgym.
____________________
Don't take legal advice from a lawyer on the Internet. I'm a lawyer but I'm not your lawyer.
Don't take legal advice from a lawyer on the Internet. I'm a lawyer but I'm not your lawyer.
- JHardisk
- pro musician

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 7:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
There is no way that this unit's battery usage can compete with Yamaha's use of eneloop technology. This was a big selling point for me. Check it out if you're curious.. http://www.eneloop.info/home.html" target="_blankpgym wrote:...and easier on batteries than the Zoom and Edirol and on par with the Yamaha when using alkalines and NiMH rechargables.
Pgym.
I also checked out the tascam, but it was a little too large, and recording quality wasn't quite on par with the other units.
For the OP, check out this site... http://forums.oreilly.com/content/Audio ... Recorders/" target="_blank
Some great reviews and info there.
~John Hardisky
- cambrook
- pro musician

- Posts: 547
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:50 pm
- Location: Perth, Australia
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
Not making any comment on the recorders here, but couldn't you buy a set of eneloop batteries and put them in your recorder of choice? After reading a few things on the www I'm keen to try them.
All the best,
Cam
All the best,
Cam
-
SinNawlins
- bugler

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:03 pm
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
I won my Zoom H4 on eBay for $225 and have been pleased. I got some rechargeable NiMH AA's at Sam's and it does 3-4 hours per pair, which more than I ever need. I like the flexibility of the various inputs options as well as the H4's built-in mic's which are good. The multi-track recording seems pretty complicated. I tried it once and gave up for lack of time to study it. Everything else is easy.
-
pgym
- 4 valves

- Posts: 769
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
Didn't say it does. I said:JHardisk wrote:There is no way that this unit's battery usage can compete with Yamaha's use of eneloop technology.pgym wrote:...and easier on batteries than the Zoom and Edirol and on par with the Yamaha when using alkalines and NiMH rechargables.
Pgym.
If I had tested the Tascam with eneloops, I expect the results would have been the same.on par with the YAMAHA when USING ALKALINES AND NiMH rechargeables.
Interesting. In my testing, the Yamaha Protrak CX and 2G consistently turned in the worst performance in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, clipping, and bass response (a rather important consideration for a tubist, one would think): the last being something observed by this reviewer as well.I also checked out the tascam, but it was a little too large, and recording quality wasn't quite on par with the other units.
Including the review linked above.For the OP, check out this site... http://forums.oreilly.com/content/Audio ... Recorders/" target="_blank" target="_blank
Some great reviews and info there.
Pgym.
____________________
Don't take legal advice from a lawyer on the Internet. I'm a lawyer but I'm not your lawyer.
Don't take legal advice from a lawyer on the Internet. I'm a lawyer but I'm not your lawyer.
-
ASRtalks
- lurker

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
Thank you all for the comments on this topic. Recently I have been looking into old Tape Deck recorders that also have a playback speaker included. I am really looking for something for solely educational purposes. Does anyone have experience using these older recording devices? If so, would I be wasting my time by purchasing one.
Aaron
Aaron
-
eupher61
- 6 valves

- Posts: 2790
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm
Re: Zoom recorder vs. competitors
If you're talking quality of recording, reel-to-reel is the only way to go.
If you just want something to pick up sound and replay it, quality be damned, any cassette recorder will do.
If you just want something to pick up sound and replay it, quality be damned, any cassette recorder will do.
