
Never worked for me...



"Mass"? With an "M"? Well, dang it, that explains it -- I've been using the wrong stuff! ("caveat posterior", indeed!)windshieldbug wrote:
Never worked for me...



Sorry 'bout the diversion -- I have no experience with them, one way or the other. My Cerveny-built Sear has done fine without them for 35 years, so I never felt the need to experiment; if they work for you (for whatever reason), stick with 'em! Do what works.sailn2ba wrote:Well, I tried to private e-mail KevinH to say:
I really am trying to get feedback on these addits. I felt that monster weights pushed the "blatt threshold" of my Cerveny to higher level, and I'm trying to find out whether that was a mental adjustment on my part, or if other folks could confirm.
but they say that he's not there. Hey, guys. . . my nutrition is just fine.



Indeed one can -- it's always worked for me!The Jackson wrote:Maybe one can further state that, just as with added mass to the instrument, added mass to the player will also bring about improved results?



Very true.LJV wrote:Nor the "Darwin" effect.ztuba wrote:I vote for adding mass to the horn ... not the player... can't play tuba when you are dead from obesity.


Same for me. First, I have to become an awesome tuba player. After that, I have some weight to lose.ztuba wrote:There is a tuba fad that is starting that doesn't suck ... thin people being awesome tuba players... I am working on joining this new fad![]()
![]()



Only the best players are their own worst critics.Kevin Hendrick wrote:We do tend to be our own worst critics, don't we?TubaRay wrote:Never???! I get bad comments on both of these, daily. Usually from myself.Arkietuba wrote:I've never had a bad comment on my sound or technique or anything.



I understand these are used to make people stay were they are supposed to be. Will they also keep stray players ion tempo?windshieldbug wrote: In fact, I got this stinkin' tracking anklet on...


