Fantasia tuba?

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
tbn.al
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3004
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Fantasia tuba?

Post by tbn.al »

I just watched Fantasia for the first time since I started playing tuba and noticed that there appear to be 3 diifferent tubas represented in the shots of the orchestra. What looks to be a TA EEb, a rotary stovepipe F?, and a side saddle Sousa. Does anyone know which were actually used in the performance? I believe it was 1939 Philly.
I am fortunate to have a great job that feeds my family well, but music feeds my soul.
User avatar
David Richoux
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1957
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:52 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, mostly. Also Greater Seattle at times.

Re: Fantasia tuba?

Post by David Richoux »

There was some discussion of this topic a while back:
here
(didn't answer your question ;-)
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: Fantasia tuba?

Post by Rick Denney »

Philip Donatelli was the tuba player at the Philadelphia Orchestra in 1939 and played a Conn 4/4 C with front-action pistons at the time. I don't know if Donatelli was the tuba player for the recording, however. Others might.

And my understanding is that the soundtrack has been re-recorded once and that soundtrack was used for several years. Are you sure you are listening to the original version?

The musicians and instruments pictured in the movie were jes-fo-sho.

Rick "wondering why floor-sweepers get their names in the credits but soundtrack musicians don't" Denney
User avatar
David Richoux
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1957
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:52 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, mostly. Also Greater Seattle at times.

Re: Fantasia tuba?

Post by David Richoux »

Rick Denney wrote:
Rick "wondering why floor-sweepers get their names in the credits but soundtrack musicians don't" Denney
That was asked a while back on the "Who Played Tuba" sub-forum. Jim Self gave a pretty good answer.
tbn.al
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3004
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Re: Fantasia tuba?

Post by tbn.al »

Rick Denney wrote:were jes-fo-sho
That answers my question. Also explains one of the horn player's embochure/horn position.
I am fortunate to have a great job that feeds my family well, but music feeds my soul.
User avatar
MartyNeilan
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4878
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:06 am
Location: Practicing counting rests.

Re: Fantasia tuba?

Post by MartyNeilan »

Rick Denney wrote:Philip Donatelli was the tuba player at the Philadelphia Orchestra in 1939 and played a Conn 4/4 C with front-action pistons at the time.
Using a King 2341 or Miraphone 186 as the standard for a 4/4, the Donatelli has substantially more girth and a considerably larger bell; it is about the same size (or a hair bigger) as the new generation of "compact 5/4" horns but with even more bell.
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: Fantasia tuba?

Post by Rick Denney »

MartyNeilan wrote:
Rick Denney wrote:Philip Donatelli was the tuba player at the Philadelphia Orchestra in 1939 and played a Conn 4/4 C with front-action pistons at the time.
Using a King 2341 or Miraphone 186 as the standard for a 4/4, the Donatelli has substantially more girth and a considerably larger bell; it is about the same size (or a hair bigger) as the new generation of "compact 5/4" horns but with even more bell.
Too difficult to compare these instruments. The 2341 is small for a 4/4 by anyone's standard, despite its 20" bell. Compared to, say, my York Master, it looks like a 3/4. But that York Master really is a 4/4, and except for the bell is about the size of a Miraphone. 186's have a small bell (like most rotary tubas) and a compact wrap. But it encloses about the same volume of air as the York Master. I doubt that the Donatelli Conn encloses much more air, and I have seen one in person (or it was purported to be so).

But if it pleases you to call it a 5/4, be my guest. My 4/4 York Master is bigger than some instruments labeled 5/4, any two of which might not be able to make a Rudi Meinl 5/4 if melted down and recycled. The labels obviously have little meaning.

Rick "who won't quibble over arbitrary and inconsistent standards" Denney
Post Reply