Why are composers considered musicians?

The bulk of the musical talk
Mark

Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Mark »

This is a serious question. Screenwriters and playwrites are not called actors. Architects are not called builders. Why are composers called musicians?

I realize that most composers are also musicians, some of them highly skilled on musical instruments. But, playing an instrument is not the same as writing music.
Last edited by Mark on Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by bort »

I'm not sure how to answer that, but when listening to something really great (symphony or solo), a lot of times I'm not only impressed by the skill of the performer, but amazed that the composer could dream up such a piece in the first place.
PMeuph
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1382
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:36 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by PMeuph »

Mark wrote: I realize that most composers are also musicians, some of them highly skilled on musical instruments. But, playing an instrument is not the same as writing music.
I would be really amazed to find a composer who hadn't, at some point or another in their life, been an instrumentalist/performer. Also, I think the term musician encompasses a lot of different people...(From amateurs to pros; Folk to Classical; etc...) Why shouldn't it also include those who create music? (Composers)

But, what puzzles me most is where did you hear the statement that composers are musicians?
Last edited by PMeuph on Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Yamaha YEP-642s
Boosey & Hawkes 19" Bell Imperial EEb
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Donn »

You start from a false premise - musician does not mean "one who plays an instrument", it applies to any musical faculty, including composition. [Edit: and percussion, too!]

Between someone who can play an instrument but only when told what notes to play and how long, vs. someone who can play no instrument but knows how to create music, who's the musician?
User avatar
Lectron
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:25 am
Location: Norway

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Lectron »

If any of the old composers lived today, they'd asked you why you never play some of your own stuff
Melton 200 -=- Melton 2141 -=- Cerveny 883 Opera -=- Besson 992 -=- MPCs: 3pcs steel (Sellmansberger/Parker)
User avatar
Anterux
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Portugal
Contact:

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Anterux »

Very interesting topic!

In my opinion, every part (role) is different but very important to make music.

Composers, performers and listeners. (and of course one person can be all these at the same time).

And all these are musicians. Or at least they should...
SousaSaver
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 5:19 pm

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by SousaSaver »

Mark wrote:This is a serious question. Screenwriters and playrights are not called actors. Architects are not called builders. Why are composers called musicians?

I realize that most composers are also musicians, some of them highly skilled on musical instruments. But, playing an instrument is not the same as writing music.
I agree with Donn. Most composers are very good musicians.
DHMTuba
bugler
bugler
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 9:36 am

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by DHMTuba »

Composers, performers and listeners. (and of course one person can be all these at the same time).
A teacher of mine used to draw a triangle on the board and label the three sides with those exact terms. His point: if you want to be a musician you have to work at all three.
BTW you don't necessarily have to be sitting at a desk scribbling notes on paper to be a "composer".
User avatar
cjk
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1915
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:16 pm

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by cjk »

Are tuba players considered musicians?
User avatar
TexTuba
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1424
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:01 pm

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by TexTuba »

cjk wrote:Are tuba players considered musicians?
No.

Image
Mark

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Mark »

Donn wrote:You start from a false premise - musician does not mean "one who plays an instrument", it applies to any musical faculty, including composition.
Are musicologists and musical history professors musicians?

And back to my original post, starting with your premise, playwrites are actors. But, an actor is not an actor unless he also writes plays.
User avatar
chronolith
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by chronolith »

Mark wrote:
Donn wrote:You start from a false premise - musician does not mean "one who plays an instrument", it applies to any musical faculty, including composition.
Are musicologists and musical history professors musicians?

And back to my original post, starting with your premise, playwrites are actors. But, an actor is not an actor unless he also writes plays.
This is not unlike presuming that an Egyptologist is Egyptian. As soon as you stick "ologist" or history professor on the end of something you have shifted the spectrum.
ginnboonmiller
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 325
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:47 pm

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by ginnboonmiller »

Actors, playwrights, and directors are all dramatists.

Poets, story writers and novelists are all writers.

Performers, composers and conductors are all musicians.

I don't think this is a theoretical issue, just a vocabulary issue.

Also, if you don't understand what you're playing well enough to compose something, I doubt I want to hear what you play. But that's another issue.
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Donn »

Mark wrote: And back to my original post, starting with your premise, playwrites are actors. But, an actor is not an actor unless he also writes plays.

As noted above, this is about vocabulary. The role of actors in a play might be parallel to the role of musicians in a band*, but the terms actor and musician are not themselves parallel in that way - musician is more broadly defined. A dictionary would help here.

(* conductor would indeed be a musician, so I guess it has to be a band with no conductor. )
Last edited by Donn on Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mark

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Mark »

ginnboonmiller wrote:Actors, playwrights, and directors are all dramatists.
So, comedians are not actors.
ginnboonmiller wrote:Also, if you don't understand what you're playing well enough to compose something, I doubt I want to hear what you play.
So, if an actor cannot write a screenplay, you don't want to see his movie?
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Donn »

Mark wrote:
ginnboonmiller wrote:Actors, playwrights, and directors are all dramatists.
So, comedians are not actors.
Cf. comedic actor.
Mark

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Mark »

Doc wrote:This statement, however, is utterly preposterous:
ginnboonmiller wrote: conductors are all musicians.
Give a monkey a stick, and now he's a musician? Call the stick a baton or drumstick if you want, but a monkey is still a monkey.
But can a monkey punch your ticket or help an elderly woman on or off the train? And, I have never heard a monkey shout "All aboard".
ginnboonmiller
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 325
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:47 pm

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by ginnboonmiller »

Mark wrote: So, if an actor cannot write a screenplay, you don't want to see his movie?
I make rare exceptions in the case of Flipper's shockingly honest portrayal of a helpful dolphin, and the moving, bittersweet early work of Mary Kate and Ashley Olson.
Mark

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Mark »

bloke wrote:Why is a guy who owns a construction company (and never picks up a hammer or saw) called a "builder" ?
Or general contractor. I have hired these guys before and if any of their workers were in the military, I'm sure they weren't generals.
Last edited by Mark on Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mark

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Mark »

chronolith wrote:
Mark wrote:
Donn wrote:You start from a false premise - musician does not mean "one who plays an instrument", it applies to any musical faculty, including composition.
Are musicologists and musical history professors musicians?

And back to my original post, starting with your premise, playwrites are actors. But, an actor is not an actor unless he also writes plays.
This is not unlike presuming that an Egyptologist is Egyptian. As soon as you stick "ologist" or history professor on the end of something you have shifted the spectrum.
But, Donn said:
Donn wrote:musician ... it applies to any musical faculty, ...
and in every school I am aware of, musicologist are designated as faculty in the music department.
Post Reply