Out of my way, Joe. I'll do what ever it takes to make 6 valves.bloke wrote:... fishing boat ...
Why are composers considered musicians?
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
- chronolith
- 4 valves

- Posts: 557
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
The term faculty does not just mean you are employed by a institution of higher learning. A friend of mine lost his faculties once but I can't say an professors came flying out of his ears. This would have been preferable to the reality.
I think a musician is anyone engaged in the creation of music.
He says inviting another semantic meltdown...
I think a musician is anyone engaged in the creation of music.
He says inviting another semantic meltdown...
-
pierso20
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
I guess..without getting too in depth...
it all depends on your definition.
Musician = someone who makes music
Do composers make music? Yes. Does "musician" only apply to those who PHYSICALLY make music? I don't think so.
Is a music theorist a musician? Not necessarily. Do music theorists TEND to be musicians? I would assume.
An actor could be a playwright and vice-versa. The point that has been being made is that Actor is MORE specific than Musician.
Actor is to Dramatist as Instrumentalist is to Musician
Playwright is to Dramatist as Composer is to Musician.
it all depends on your definition.
Musician = someone who makes music
Do composers make music? Yes. Does "musician" only apply to those who PHYSICALLY make music? I don't think so.
Is a music theorist a musician? Not necessarily. Do music theorists TEND to be musicians? I would assume.
An actor could be a playwright and vice-versa. The point that has been being made is that Actor is MORE specific than Musician.
Actor is to Dramatist as Instrumentalist is to Musician
Playwright is to Dramatist as Composer is to Musician.
Brooke Pierson
Music Educator
Composer
Composer http://www.brookepierson.com" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank
Music Educator
Composer
Composer http://www.brookepierson.com" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank
- MartyNeilan
- 6 valves

- Posts: 4878
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:06 am
- Location: Practicing counting rests.
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
bloke wrote:Why is a guy who owns a construction company (and never picks up a hammer or saw) called a "builder" ?

-
kprinz
- bugler

- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:40 am
- Location: Brenham, Texas
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
I agree, although this particular statment brought back "fond" memories of the SAT!An actor could be a playwright and vice-versa. The point that has been being made is that Actor is MORE specific than Musician.
Actor is to Dramatist as Instrumentalist is to Musician
Playwright is to Dramatist as Composer is to Musician.
Kendall Prinz
Tuba, Composition, Music Education
Asst. Director of Bands
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium
Blinn College
Miraphone 186-5U CC
Miraphone Elektra 481-6U Gold Brass F
Tuba, Composition, Music Education
Asst. Director of Bands
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium
Blinn College
Miraphone 186-5U CC
Miraphone Elektra 481-6U Gold Brass F
-
pgym
- 4 valves

- Posts: 769
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Comedians and actors are both subsets of the group "dramatist," which is itself a subset of the larger class "entertainer": a class that includes not only dramatists, but--among others--musicians and athletes. The subsets are neither co-extensive nor mutually exclusive, so some comedians are actors and some actors are comedians, but not all actors are comedians and not all comedians are actors.Mark wrote:So, comedians are not actors.ginnboonmiller wrote:Actors, playwrights, and directors are all dramatists.
Using biological taxonomy as a loose analogy*, "instrumentalist," "conductor," "composer," etc., are species of the genus "musician"; similarly, "comedian," "actor," "director," "screen writer," "playwright," etc., are species of the genus "dramatist." The various genera ("musician," "dramatist," "athlete," etc. together comprise the family "entertainer."
*The analogy is only a loose one, in that an individual entertainer may take on several roles within the course of a performance (e.g., a principal in a musical, or an actor-director in a play or film) or series of performances, whereas in biology, an individual specimen may belong to only a single species.
____________________
Don't take legal advice from a lawyer on the Internet. I'm a lawyer but I'm not your lawyer.
Don't take legal advice from a lawyer on the Internet. I'm a lawyer but I'm not your lawyer.
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Record producers? Stage hands? Ushers? Music Directors?chronolith wrote:I think a musician is anyone engaged in the creation of music.
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Do conductors also handle luggage at the airport?Doc wrote:Don't know for sure, but I'm not sure a conductor could either. And I sure have seen my share of conductors jump around in fits like a chimpanzee. I wouldn't take odds in Vegas on either one.
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Slightly obscure reference: What's all this talk about endangered fecies?pgym wrote:Comedians and actors are both subsets of the group "dramatist," which is itself a subset of the larger class "entertainer": a class that includes not only dramatists, but--among others--musicians and athletes. The subsets are neither co-extensive nor mutually exclusive, so some comedians are actors and some actors are comedians, but not all actors are comedians and not all comedians are actors.
Using biological taxonomy as a loose analogy*, "instrumentalist," "conductor," "composer," etc., are species of the genus "musician"; similarly, "comedian," "actor," "director," "screen writer," "playwright," etc., are species of the genus "dramatist." The various genera ("musician," "dramatist," "athlete," etc. together comprise the family "entertainer."
*The analogy is only a loose one, in that an individual entertainer may take on several roles within the course of a performance (e.g., a principal in a musical, or an actor-director in a play or film) or series of performances, whereas in biology, an individual specimen may belong to only a single species.
More obscure reference: I thought you said you were Canadian.
Does being so clever make me a genus? And if instrumentalist is a species, are tuba players a sub-species or a variety? I assume that a tuba player can breed with a flute player; but can an oboe plaer breed with a conductor?
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Why are leaders of orchestras called conductors and leaders of bands called directors? Are both conductors and directors part of the one percent? (This question is for bloke.)
-
tclements
- TubeNet Sponsor

- Posts: 1515
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:49 am
- Location: Campbell, CA
- Contact:
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Don't ask me. Obviously, many of them aren't.....
Tony Clements
https://www.symphonysanjose.org/perform ... s/?REF=MTM
https://www.symphonysanjose.org/perform ... s/?REF=MTM
-
kprinz
- bugler

- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:40 am
- Location: Brenham, Texas
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Could band directors be called such because they, especially if they are involved in public school education, have a great deal of extra-musical responsibilities in addition to the artistic direction of the ensemble and therefore have developed a title that reflects those responsibilities (similar to the "director" of a business or board). I don't have any experience with the professional orchestra conducting role; however, as a middle school band director I can tell you that only about 20-50% of my daily responsibilities have anything to do with music and even less to do with the art of conducting. Perhaps the "director" title came about because they are responsible for the oversight of the program, which would include inventory, budget, recruiting & retention, (you name it...) in addition to musical programming and concert preparation. I'm fairly certain, at least in my area (Texas) that the position name for one in charge of public school orchestras is "director" not conductor.
Kendall Prinz
Tuba, Composition, Music Education
Asst. Director of Bands
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium
Blinn College
Miraphone 186-5U CC
Miraphone Elektra 481-6U Gold Brass F
Tuba, Composition, Music Education
Asst. Director of Bands
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium
Blinn College
Miraphone 186-5U CC
Miraphone Elektra 481-6U Gold Brass F
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
So, since many conductors are also music directors, this complicates the issue. And, what exactly is the difference between a music director and a musical director?
-
kprinz
- bugler

- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:40 am
- Location: Brenham, Texas
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Just for fun I looked up music director in wikipedia.com: A music director may be the director of an orchestra, the director of music for a film, the director of music at a radio station, the head of the music department in a school, the co-ordinator of the musical ensembles in a university or college (but not usually the head of the academic music department), the head bandmaster of a military band, the head organist and choirmaster of a church, or an Organist and Master of the Choristers (a title given to a Director of Music at a Cathedral, particularly in England).
I also looked up musical director in both dictionary.com and wikipedia.com: In both cases, there was no match for musical director, and I was redirected to music director. I'm not a master of the written word, but I believe I remember having someone in the past tell me that "musical director" is an improper use of the English language for some reason.
I also looked up musical director in both dictionary.com and wikipedia.com: In both cases, there was no match for musical director, and I was redirected to music director. I'm not a master of the written word, but I believe I remember having someone in the past tell me that "musical director" is an improper use of the English language for some reason.
Kendall Prinz
Tuba, Composition, Music Education
Asst. Director of Bands
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium
Blinn College
Miraphone 186-5U CC
Miraphone Elektra 481-6U Gold Brass F
Tuba, Composition, Music Education
Asst. Director of Bands
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium
Blinn College
Miraphone 186-5U CC
Miraphone Elektra 481-6U Gold Brass F
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
A musical director might be a director that is musical. Or, it could be a director of a musical.kprinz wrote:I also looked up musical director in both dictionary.com and wikipedia.com: In both cases, there was no match for musical director, and I was redirected to music director. I'm not a master of the written word, but I believe I remember having someone in the past tell me that "musical director" is an improper use of the English language for some reason.
- Kevin Hendrick
- 6 valves

- Posts: 3156
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:51 pm
- Location: Location: Location
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Wouldn't someone who only starts and stops things be better referred to as a "semiconductor"?bloke wrote:' played a concert last night (repeated this afternoon) with THREE conductors and ONE (pretty darn good) orchestra - the Memphis Symphony Orchestra.knuxie wrote:I think of it like a conductor of a train...basically they are in charge of starting and stopping the thing. Otherwise, it goes on without their help.
Each conductor was responsible one of these pieces:
Hindemith - Symphonic Metamorphosis
Ravel - Piano Concerto
Dvorak - New World Symphony
The levels of musical (as in "musician") results were subtle, but notable. The conductors did more that start/stop the things.
"Don't take life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent." -- Pogo (via Walt Kelly)
- chronolith
- 4 valves

- Posts: 557
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Yes Mark, the stagehands... And the folks that make the stagehand's shoes also. Also the people that sold him/her the shoes. Also the people that deliver the coffee to the shoeshop where he/she bought the shoes. Also the refinery worker that plugged off the leak in containment tank that helped produce the fuel that the delivery driver used in the truck that delivered the coffee. All musicians.Mark wrote:Record producers? Stage hands? Ushers? Music Directors?chronolith wrote:I think a musician is anyone engaged in the creation of music.
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
So, if the guy who made the stage hands shoes composed 4'33", would he still be a musician?bloke wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=46876
- chronolith
- 4 valves

- Posts: 557
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
With a heartfelt grumble, yes.Mark wrote:So, if the guy who made the stage hands shoes composed 4'33", would he still be a musician?bloke wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=46876
The reason I so easily include composers in the musician category is that "musician" is by no means an honorific title. It is not earned with anything more than the most rudimentary skill and some token amount of effort and commitment, and perhaps a coupon to the Guitar Center. Hence I happily claim John Cage as a composer and a musician (please send all flames via PM).
-
Mark
Re: Why are composers considered musicians?
Are you correlating 4'33" with the prize in a box of cat litter?chronolith wrote:With a heartfelt grumble, yes.Mark wrote:So, if the guy who made the stage hands shoes composed 4'33", would he still be a musician?bloke wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=46876I am also a musician when I am scooping cat **** out of a box in my basement. Correlation does not equal causation, although that does give me an idea for an NEA grant request.
The reason I so easily include composers in the musician category is that "musician" is by no means an honorific title. It is not earned with anything more than the most rudimentary skill and some token amount of effort and commitment, and perhaps a coupon to the Guitar Center. Hence I happily claim John Cage as a composer and a musician (please send all flames via PM).
I once heard someone say that depending on the intent, dropping a book on the floor could be music.
We already know about some of the waste product creations that the NEA considers art, go for the grant.
More analogies: John Cage is to composer as Andy Warhol is to ?