Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Stefan
bugler
bugler
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:30 am
Location: Southern York County. PA.
Contact:

Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by Stefan »

If any of you have spent some time comparing these 2 tubas, I'd love to hear your opinions. I own a Petrushka and I like it, but when I bought it I knew the 2250 was on the horizon. Eventually I will go to BBC and compare them myself, but for now I'd just like to hear what you guys have to say.

Stefan
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by MikeMason »

I prefered the 2250 by around 20%.both were great tubas.if I owned the Mira,there wasn't enough difference to go through the hassle/expense of switching.both are great...
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
User avatar
bisontuba
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4320
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:55 am
Location: Bottom of Lake Erie

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by bisontuba »

Hi-
If you are comparing a Petrushka and a MW 2250, you DEFINITELY will also want to try and compare the new Gemeinhardt F tuba with those other two--I think you will be very pleasantly surprised.....

Good luck!
mark
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by bort »

Stefan, you are stoll usin the Petrushka as your only tuba, right? I wonder if that factors into peoples opinions at all here? BTW, how is that going?
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by bort »

Also, not to hijak this, but how does the Willson piston F fit into this mix too?
User avatar
k001k47
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1469
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:54 am
Location: Tejas

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by k001k47 »

jonesmj wrote:Hi-
If you are comparing a Petrushka and a MW 2250, you DEFINITELY will also want to try and compare the new Gemeinhardt F tuba with those other two--I think you will be very pleasantly surprised.....

Good luck!
mark
Don't forget about the Kanstul grand f, even though I've never played it. :mrgreen:
User avatar
jtuba
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 713
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Norfolk, VA

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by jtuba »

The MW 2250 plays better than the Kanstul and Gemeinhardt. If you're on a budget, buy the G. The Petroushka plays well too, but I prefer the 2250.
Adjunct Tuba Professor, Christopher Newport University
Eastman Artist

Image
User avatar
Mojo workin'
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:44 pm
Location: made of teflon, behind the bull's eye

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by Mojo workin' »

Stefan, I think that since you are a wealthy school teacher, you should buy a 2250, bring it home, compare it to your Petrushka, and donate the one that you don't want to a fellow professional who doesn't own an F tuba. He would appreciate it.
User avatar
Stefan
bugler
bugler
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:30 am
Location: Southern York County. PA.
Contact:

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by Stefan »

Yeah, the Petrushka is currently my only tuba. Gemeinhardt, eh? Where can I go to try one - a flute symposium :). It will be hard to get the flute thing out of my head, but I am certainly willing to try one. Mojo - that sounds like a good idea. I will certainly do that when I win the lottery. Thanks for the responses folks.

Stefan
User avatar
Stefan
bugler
bugler
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:30 am
Location: Southern York County. PA.
Contact:

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by Stefan »

Bort -

Yeah, I really think I made the right decision moving exclusively to F. I just don't play professionally enough to need 2 tubas and I am having much more fun working on solos rather than excerpts of pieces I will likely never play. Sure, there are times where a big tuba is the sound needed for a situation, but oh well. It's more important that I enjoy being a musician again. That wasn't happening with the CC.

Stefan
User avatar
cle_tuba
bugler
bugler
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:33 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by cle_tuba »

Hi
I own a MW2250 and I love it ....
I use it for everything, I chose this tube due to its ability to adapt!
It is a complete instrument, used for everything, ensemble, quintet, brass band, orchestra, solo ... Finally, it is complete!
I've had other tubes that were wonderful for one thing or another thing, but for everything it alone ...
:D
Cleverson Zavatto
Tubist
tubaclay
lurker
lurker
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:50 pm

Re: Miraphone Petrushka vs MW 2250

Post by tubaclay »

2250 getting it done on the bottom tuba part in 4tet!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39dxA6Ff ... er&list=UL" target="_blank" target="_blank
Post Reply