Rotor valve direction difference explained (?) Bookmark and Share

The bulk of the musical talk

Moderator: Uber Moderators

Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby T. J. Ricer » Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:41 pm

Hey Guys,
Since the question of rotary valve direction has been brought up and shot down a few times on this board, I thought this video might be of interest, as it does a better job of explaining things by using a cut out valve to show the concept. It is not so much the direction the valve turns that is the issue, as which port the air enters on the valve. Clear as mud?

As always, feel free to believe or disbelieve that this would make any noticeable difference.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R93fvioIZ28

the discussion of valve direction happens at 1:45

--T. J.
Thomas J. Ricer, DMA
Royal Hawaiian Band - University of Hawaii at Manoa - Yamaha Performing Artist

http://www.TJRicer.com

"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." -John Lennon
User avatar
T. J. Ricer
3 valves
3 valves
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:17 pm

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby bloke » Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:50 am

If you notice, the video is jerky when the valve is restored to its original position, because there is an instant on the return when the air is blocked off.

Other problems are that 1/ everything up to 1:30 is pure nonsense, and 2/ I just don't know any professionals who play Yamaha symphony bore tenor or bass trombones except for one person I know (due to a celebrity player relative) to whom one was given.

Thanks for posting the youtube link, though.
User avatar
bloke
TubeNet Sponsor
TubeNet Sponsor
 
Posts: 26675
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: western Tennessee

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby goodgigs » Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:20 am

At 2:22 the words contradict the video. The ports are not totally "blocked off".
They didn't show the release of the valve because it would assume the exact same position on the far side port as the "bad" example, shown later.
In my opinion there is one good reason to consider rotational direction.
The air flow will be reversed in some part of a rotor either in up or down paddle position, so that's not it.
A linkage can be built to do anything you want, so that's not it either.
DRAINAGE. I can think of no other.
Brian "Goodgigs" Kane
goodgigs
5 valves
5 valves
 
Posts: 1871
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Santa Cruz CA

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby Lingon » Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:50 am

T. J. Ricer wrote:...Since the question of rotary valve direction has been brought up and shot down a few times on this board, I thought this video might be of interest...

Thanks for the link. It confirms much of my experiences, that there is really something happening when changing direction, from different trombones and their valves.The internal shape of the valves may also have influence. However valve rotation and impact on a tuba, well that may be for the more experienced but this, as much other stuff, may be something to tinker with.

bloke wrote:...I just don't know any professionals who play Yamaha symphony bore tenor or bass trombones except for one person I know...

Hmm, Douglas Yeo, Boston, and Ian Bousfield, Vienna, just to mention one for each, or you may have meant know personally?
John Lingesjo
User avatar
Lingon
3 valves
3 valves
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:41 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby Lectron » Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:58 am

Open wrap and thayer valve FTW :tuba:
User avatar
Lectron
3 valves
3 valves
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:25 am

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby Lingon » Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:44 am

Lectron wrote:...Open wrap and thayer valve FTW :tuba:...

Hehehe, the open vs closed wrap could be discussed. I believe there have been done flow tests and no noticeable differences could be found. The open wrap is of course easier to make, fewer bends. And it is also a big sales gimmick with better water draining. The Thayer valve, of course it has an impact which also the Hagmann valve has. The sound is clearly different, but is it better or worse than anything else?!
FWIW, I heard rumors that one the big makers now have begun experimenting with different shaped spit valve corks and their impact on the sound...
John Lingesjo
User avatar
Lingon
3 valves
3 valves
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:41 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby TubaTinker » Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:31 am

cynical as it sounds.... After spending over 30 years in manufacturing, machine design, and automation... I find it very difficult to swallow that any manufacturing change is done to improve the product without making it cheaper to manufacture or more attractive to the market. Colleges are pouring out young folks with marketing degrees who don't have a clue how or why something is made the way it is.

I could care less which direction a rotor turns.

Let's get back to 'the gap' or 'silver vs. lacquer'... or the new thread about 'polishing the inside'.
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
Band Instrument Repair
Newburgh, Indiana
http://thevillagetinker.com
danschultz@wowway.com
Current 'stable'... Marzan slant-rotor BBb, Marzan piston BBb, Miraphone 1291 5V, Conn 48K sousa
User avatar
TubaTinker
TubeNet Sponsor
TubeNet Sponsor
 
Posts: 8071
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby MartyNeilan » Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:05 am

TubaTinker wrote:Colleges are pouring out young folks with marketing degrees who don't have a clue how or why something is made the way it is.

There used to be a saying, something along the lines of, "There is no engineering problem that can't be solved by marketing." I think the auto industry learned this to be false the hard way.
User avatar
MartyNeilan
6 valves
6 valves
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:06 am
Location: Nashville, TN - KnowWhatIMean?

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby Curmudgeon » Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:10 am

MartyNeilan wrote:
TubaTinker wrote:Colleges are pouring out young folks with marketing degrees who don't have a clue how or why something is made the way it is.

There used to be a saying, something along the lines of, "There is no engineering problem that can't be solved by marketing." I think the auto industry learned this to be false the hard way.


One word: Fiero.
User avatar
Curmudgeon
pro musician
pro musician
 
Posts: 4137
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: Curmudgeonville, USA

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby bloke » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:08 am

Yeo paid money for his?
User avatar
bloke
TubeNet Sponsor
TubeNet Sponsor
 
Posts: 26675
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: western Tennessee

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby PMeuph » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:24 am

bloke wrote:Yeo paid money for his?



I don't know if Yeo personally footed the bill to his "signature" horn and mouthpiece, but I do know that other Yamaha artists usually buy their own horns (with a significant discount).
_____
What about Pete Sullivan?
http://www.yamaha.com/artists/petersullivan.html
Yamaha YEP-642s
Besson New Standard 3-valve compensator
Boosey & Co. Solbron ca. 1921
Boosey & Hawkes 19" Bell Imperial EEb
PMeuph
5 valves
5 valves
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Rotor valve direction difference explained (?)

Postby ghmerrill » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:30 am

MartyNeilan wrote:There used to be a saying, something along the lines of, "There is no engineering problem that can't be solved by marketing." I think the auto industry learned this to be false the hard way.


Well, the guys doing the actual design, engineering, and production did (of course they already knew this). But the guys with the marketing degrees, I think, did not -- since many have been rewarded with continuing jobs and benefits supported by tax dollars. I've worked to some degree with such marketing folks over a number of years, and some of them are very good in knowing the features of their products, benefits and disadvantages, and comparing these to competitors' products. But they typically share a fundamental belief and attitude, which is that it doesn't matter what they're selling (from shoes to pharmaceuticals to cars to software to ...) -- they can sell it and that's their job. Not at all unreasonable since that 's exactly what they're trained and hired to do. They are in a sales competition, and not a product competition. The problem arises when these people rise to a level in the company where they then have the power to make design, quality, and production decisions. Short-term sales statistics (linked to the sort of compensation that sales and marketing is driven by) in turn then drive design and production quality decisions with predictable results. And mean time between vice presidents in such situations is probably on the order of two or three years. Then the VP moves on to another similar job -- and another like him is rotated into the vacant position.
Gary Merrill

Wessex EEb "Symphonic" bass tuba (TU-17)
Amati oval euph (Doug Elliott J6Es shank on ...)
Mack Brass compensating euph (Doug Elliott EUPH LN104J9)
Buescher 1924 3-valve Eb, Denis Wick 5
ghmerrill
3 valves
3 valves
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:48 am
Location: Central North Carolina

Next

Return to TubeNet

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Donn, GC, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, NCSUSousa, Tubajug and 14 guests