Low range mpc for 188?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Low range mpc for 188?

Post by bort »

Wow, thanks for all the input everyone, sorry I didn't get to check back in sooner. A few things in here I want to try, so thanks for the pointers.

Regarding the low register of the 188, it's certainly a known quantity for me, and I know exactly what it is and isn't. Just looking for something that might help take a little of the work out of it, or at least not be counterproductive to my efforts.

Thanks!
joh_tuba
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:34 pm

Re: Low range mpc for 188?

Post by joh_tuba »

A well adjusted clean 188 is capable of a very deadly low end.

Sure, try a few mouthpieces, but I would also encourage you to listen very critically to the quality/character of the sound the 188 WANTS to produce. The 188 is not a 6/4 tuba and any effort to produce a 6/4esque sound on it will result in a marked loss of resonance, projection and efficiency.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Low range mpc for 188?

Post by bort »

joh_tuba wrote:A well adjusted clean 188 is capable of a very deadly low end.

Sure, try a few mouthpieces, but I would also encourage you to listen very critically to the quality/character of the sound the 188 WANTS to produce. The 188 is not a 6/4 tuba and any effort to produce a 6/4esque sound on it will result in a marked loss of resonance, projection and efficiency.
Well, I certainly have no expectation (nor desire) for a 6/4 sound from this tuba. :) Still a good idea, and I completely believe in NOT fighting the tuba, which is actually one big reason I like the 188 so much (the tuba and I both work well together).

I'll give a few things a try and post some results here when I can!
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: Low range mpc for 188?

Post by iiipopes »

If you have superior breath support, the Wick 1L. It will give a big, wide, velvety tone to the low register, but its wide throat takes a lot of air.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
Norm in Bellevue
bugler
bugler
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: now in Helena, MT

Re: Low range mpc for 188?

Post by Norm in Bellevue »

It may seem counterintuitive, but the Miraphone Rose Solo TU-27 produces a very easy and loud low range on my 188. But for a rounder sound, I'm back to playing with my PT-50. I just have to work a little harder.
Miraphone 188
Parke Ofenloch
Continental Divide Tuba Society
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Low range mpc for 188?

Post by bort »

Thanks Norm... actually, I use a TU-27 about 90% of the time, it works great with the horn!
User avatar
Todd S. Malicoate
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2378
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK

Re: Low range mpc for 188?

Post by Todd S. Malicoate »

Third page of the thread. Is it time yet for the obligatory post about how that Eb on a Bb or C tuba isn't a "pedal tone"?

On a more helpful note, you might consider working on the Tommy Johnson "pedal shift" technique. I use it on C tuba up to around F# with pretty good results (those results being super loud volumes available).
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Low range mpc for 188?

Post by bort »

Todd S. Malicoate wrote:Third page of the thread. Is it time yet for the obligatory post about how that Eb on a Bb or C tuba isn't a "pedal tone"?
Busted. :oops:
Post Reply