Chinese tubas

The bulk of the musical talk
Locked
gvtuba
lurker
lurker
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:03 am

Chinese tubas

Post by gvtuba »

I am interested in getting advice on a couple of tubas. I am interested in the King 2341 clone and the e flat models. I have been told by a very reputable member that the valves on the King clone are better than the new King.

I am limited slightly in the lung capacity/volume area (at 66 that ain't all!) Are these horns easy to project? How about intonation, etc.

Thanks.
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10427
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Chinese tubas

Post by Dan Schultz »

There's a 2341 clone?
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
User avatar
Art Hovey
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1508
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 12:28 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Chinese tubas

Post by Art Hovey »

I tried a couple of them at the Army Tuba Conference. The main thing I noticed was that the leadpipe and receiver are angled differently. For me the real King is comfortable but the Chinese version has the mouthpiece lower but aiming uphill. Some people like that, but I find it very uncomfortable. If you are a short person and like to blow uphill you may like it.
Bob Kolada
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Chinese tubas

Post by Bob Kolada »

I much prefer the King over the 2341 copy. Jonathan's 1291 copy at Midwest was a very nice horn though. The Hirsbrunner copies are nice, maybe the best of the Bb's. There's one on here-
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=53100" target="_blank
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: Chinese tubas

Post by Rick Denney »

Art Hovey wrote:I tried a couple of them at the Army Tuba Conference. The main thing I noticed was that the leadpipe and receiver are angled differently. For me the real King is comfortable but the Chinese version has the mouthpiece lower but aiming uphill. Some people like that, but I find it very uncomfortable. If you are a short person and like to blow uphill you may like it.
I found the same. Also, I didn't get the resonance that I'm accustomed to on the better Kings.

Bloke, it ain't patent infringement. There are no current patents on that design. In the world of wristwatches (where most patents ran their course decades ago), they'd use the term "homage" rather than "replica" or "fake". The original, though, isn't so expensive to warrant what one must give up to get the...homage.

Yes, we respect original design for its own sake. Sometimes we have to put our money where out mouth is to do so.

Rick "who'd rather have a real King, even if an old one to get to the right price point" Denney
Locked