Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
redstripe2
lurker
lurker
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:29 pm

Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by redstripe2 »

I was wondering what you guys thought about the B&S Neptune Rotary Valve Model
jimgray
bugler
bugler
Posts: 230
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 12:27 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by jimgray »

I owned one.
Great horns! Very easy to play - super efficient for such a big instrument.
In the end, I sold it and would not buy another. Just wasn't quite the sound in my head - kindof an odd mix of German and American.

The way I see it: if you want a big German sound, get a Fafner or a Rudy 5/4 or a big Alex.

Try it, though-
They can be had on the cheap sometimes and YMMV...
They are bigger and brighter than a pt-6 (r), and some may like that.

Jim
User avatar
Cameron Gates
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:25 am
Location: Lizard Land

Re: Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by Cameron Gates »

jimgray wrote: kindof an odd mix of German and American.

The way I see it: if you want a big German sound, get a Fafner or a Rudy 5/4 or a big Alex.

Try it, though-
They can be had on the cheap sometimes and YMMV...
They are bigger and brighter than a pt-6 (r), and some may like that.

Jim
Jim nailed it IMO.

I have played a grand total of 2 of these things. One was a very decent instrument, one was a bit of a head scratcher. Both played far smaller and BRIGHTER than what I would expect of an instrument of that size. A 5/4 Rudi, although a bit smaller to the eye, will put a much better bottom on an ensemble. Never played a PT6 in a group, can't comment.

Seems to me all the Neptune lovers are hearing with their eyes, not their ears. Also seems to me that there are cheaper and easier to transport models of tubas if one is needing a brightish sound.
GO DUCKS
Sam Gnagey
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 9:09 am
Location: Columbia City, Indiana

Re: Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by Sam Gnagey »

Had both a Rudy 5/4 and a Neptune at the same time. Let the Neptune go....just not as efficient and in tune as the Rudy. Eventually sold the Rudy too; for last ten+ years using my 4/4 Gnagey CC for most playing.
User avatar
Cameron Gates
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:25 am
Location: Lizard Land

Re: Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by Cameron Gates »

Grooving for Heaven wrote:
Cameron Gates wrote:
Seems to me all the Neptune lovers are hearing with their eyes, not their ears. .
Listen to Ed Jones play with the Ft worth symphony, and then come back and repeat that statement, ok?
Easy there Chief, ok?

I am sure he sounds great. I'm just expressing an opinion based on my limited experience with these horns. I know there are at least 10,000 tuba players alive today with differing opinions (most of them more valid) than mine. That is why I used the "IMO".

Again, I'm sure he sounds wonderful. Just not the horn for me. Remember, without opinions Tubenet would have tumbleweeds.
GO DUCKS
Mark Horne
bugler
bugler
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Re: Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by Mark Horne »

I own a Neptune and I've been surprised that they are not more prevalent and appear to be inexpensive on the secondary market. Aside from the fact that they are big and heavy, they are quite versatile horns and are surprisingly nimble in the high range and well behaved in quiet passages.

Mechanically, the wrap is virtually identical to my Alexander 163, and I detect a lot of similarities in the sound, feel, and intonation - overall I would say that the Neptune is a "friendlier" horn to play - the sound is a bit more resonant in the low end; the feel is more even throughout the range; and the intonation is a little better behaved (I use the smaller of the two available leadpipes - I understand that the larger pipe gives more of the "American" BAT quality).

For a player who prefers rotors and needs the heft of a 6/4, but doesn't want to feel like they are bringing a musical sledge hammer to every gig should look into trying a Neptune.
Alexander 163 CC 5V, MW Thor, Mel Culbertson Neptune, B&S Symphonie F 6V
Bob Kolada
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by Bob Kolada »

I agree with the "sounds somewhat smaller than one would would think" comments, but I like these- they're very responsive and easy playing.
toobagrowl
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by toobagrowl »

I've only played on one of these at the WW&BW booth many years ago. I kinda liked it, though, it was too big for anything I needed. It is one of the prettiest modern tubas made - the overall shape (like a 6/4 version of the PT-6) is very nice, but the detailing on the rotor paddles and the engraving on the bell really caught my eye. It's one of the few big 6/4 tubas that I felt "at home" with. :tuba:
I liked the response - it had maybe just a bit more resistance than most other modern 6/4 tubas - not too free and not too stuffy, maybe not quite as "quick" a response as some of the air-hogs.
It was somewhat hard to gauge sound and intonation in the booth with other tuba players tooting on other tubas. But from what I could hear, the sound was very thick and 'chocolately' and smooth. Again, this was just from my experience with one of these.
I'd really like to hear/experience more with the Neptune to get a better opinion.
jeopardymaster
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 982
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Ft Thomas, KY

Re: Thoughts on the B&S Neptune Rotary Model

Post by jeopardymaster »

I did a pretty quick scan and saw no one else comment yet on the choice of leadpipes available on the Neptune. I personally prefer the control I get from the smaller one - not so drastically different from my Gnagey - but I could get used to the bigger one. As to comparisons to the Rudy Meinl 5/4, I did a side-by-side with one and found them EXTREMELY close dimensionally, such that each fits almost perfectly in the other's hard case. Both are awfully heavy, and I do NOT like playing either one without a stand. I find the Neptune easier to center, especially with the smaller leadpipe, and mine plays much better in tune than the Rudy I tried - my only issue is that the bottom line open g plays a hair sharp in some keys. Maybe I just got lucky.
Gnagey CC, VMI Neptune 4098 CC, Mirafone 184-5U CC and 56 Bb, Besson 983 EEb and euphonium, King marching baritone, Alexander 163 BBb, Conn 71H/112H bass trombone, Olds Recording tenor trombone.
Post Reply