Sanders: B&S vs. China

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
eupher61
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2790
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm

Re: Sanders: B&S vs. China

Post by eupher61 »

my Sanders was a Cerveny...Piggy. both names on the bell. therein lies a 3rd option.
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10427
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Sanders: B&S vs. China

Post by Dan Schultz »

Joe... the word 'Imperial' engraved by the 'Sanders' logo should be convincing enough. I've posted these images before. Notice that the back plate on the backside of the bell harness loop is smaller than normal. The thumbring has an oval profile. The leadpipe brace is narrow and is actually hollow on the backside. The 'keel' is also hollow on the backside. Of course... one actually has to have the horn apart to see some of these things. The best way I can describe the attributes of the braces, etc. is by using the work 'cheesy'.... one of those terms that's really difficult to quantify.

I know some of this stuff is difficult to detect from simple pictures. If I didn't know the subtle differences myself... I would argue that this horn was made in Czechoslovakia.

Don't pay any attention to the bow guard wires. That is 'stick-on' sousaphone molding.

All that being said... the particular instrument in these pictures IS NOT a bad horn. It was probably made in the early 80's and plays as well as any of the other B & S-made stencils I've seen.

This horn is still in town. I suppose I could borrow it for some close-up images.
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Sanders: B&S vs. China

Post by bort »

eupher61 wrote:my Sanders was a Cerveny...Piggy. both names on the bell. therein lies a 3rd option.
I've seen one of those too.

The PT-3 I played in college was also marked with both B&S and Sanders logos on the bell.
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: Sanders: B&S vs. China

Post by Rick Denney »

My early-80's Sanders Model SM-1314U was a Cerveny, through and through. "Made in Czechoslovakia" on the receiver, and stick-on label that said "Sanders" (and probably "Amati" underneath it). Low-grade plastic ball joint linkages, which I replaced. 0.795 bore. Not a bad horn, but a soft dent-magnet. It had curved paddles, the way the Czech and older DDR horns often did, but open-wire springs.

Weren't all the "imperial" models made in China?

Don't they all have Country of Origin markings, as is required by law?

But I remember the ads from that era. Custom Music had "Sanders" models (Cerveny), "B&S Sanders" models, and "B&S Parantucci" models. These were all clearly distinguished in the ads, and the B&S tubas were always easily identified by the shape of the thumb-ring flange. Later, they had "Sanders Imperial" models, from you-know-where.

Rick "thinking Sanders is a gray area" Denney
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10427
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Sanders: B&S vs. China

Post by Dan Schultz »

This Sanders 'Imperial' just popped-up on Ebay.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Tuba-Sanders-Im ... 257da2a0b0

Still not detailed enough images except of the bow guard in picture #5.
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
Post Reply