Here.
I have already suggested using a bit better graphics and also explaining that the notes are shown 8va. It is good to learn how to read string bass parts, but it should be said








Key point. I wouldn't be too sure we all start out equally endowed there, but for sure it's easier to develop it when young. Not that it isn't worth a try later on, even if it never gets to the point where it's useful. There's a whole chunk of your brain waiting to get a crack at this music thing, and if you're like me it will always be a mystery what it's up to, but it can be gratifying.bloke wrote:Again, I starting working on this mess when I was about ten years old.


[/quote]Donn wrote: On the diminished thing ... has it occurred to anyone else that the chord chart isn't really what we're doing? It's an ideal description of the guitar part or accordion left hand, and a bass player can work with it, but the skilled bass player is the one who can "interpret" a chord chart, essentially reconstructing a bass line that is implied by that chord sequence. (That's my theory anyway; it isn't really a skill I possess, because I can get by well enough just by ear that I've never had the ambition to really learn to play by charts - I mean, I can use them if I don't know the tune, but until I can "hear" the next note in my head, it isn't going to be very good.)
So, back to diminished chords, this seems relevant because here's a case where the chord represents a particularly "dynamic" moment - you'd rarely hang on a diminished for a bunch of measures, am I right? - and possibly represents a number of different musical circumstances that the guitar or accordion must play the same, but from the bass player's perspective are significantly different.


Here is one that I found and downloaded a while back. It was free to register for a trial period I downloaded anything I found useful and just cancelled my subscription before being charged:sousaphone68 wrote:
Awhile ago there was a thread were people posted public domain fake book sources.
Search function is frustrating and has failed to find it.
Anybody feel like posting their fake book again.

Was looking forward to hearing this comparison but I guess that one needs to be a filedropper.com member and logged in to enjoy?bloke wrote:When I perform with NOLA jazz musicians (unless they're playing 40's music..."requests", etc...tunes they generally pretend to "not know") they generally do not "swing" (even when playing much more recently-composed NOLA jazz). Yes. I agree/believe with Joe that early jazz (and more authentic revivals) is an "early form of rock and roll".tubajoe wrote:I firmly believe that Dixieland is an early form of Rock n Roll.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvw0a_2uezE
original (1923)
http://www.filedropper.com/10highsociety
21st century NOLA jazz musicians

A few years ago a San Francisco rock radio station did a week-long sequence of SF Rock history. The first song they played was "Annie Street Rock" (a 1946 original by Lu Watters Yerba Buena Jazz Band.) (Dick Lammi, a converted banjo player on tuba, BTW.)tubajoe wrote:I firmly believe that Dixieland is an early form of Rock n Roll.




If you insist! Hey! ... what's up with the extended footage of a stinking pigeon, while ... ah, there she is again. That looks rather strenuous, I bet she'd enjoy dancing like that more here where it's cool.pwhitaker wrote:Check out the dancer

I thought the pigeon did a very authentic NOLA strut. Probably just like the jazz pigeons on Bourbon street did in the roaring '20's.Donn wrote:... what's up with the extended footage of a stinking pigeon,pwhitaker wrote:Check out the dancer
