Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
-
Maximum_Tuba
- lurker

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:40 am
Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
Hello again, just wanted some general reviews and comments on the PT 88 and +. One question though is the + worth the money.
-
Tuboss2
- 3 valves

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:11 pm
Re: Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
It's a big boy mouthpiece no doubt about it.
And I played on a PT-86 before, and the tone I could produce on it was fat as hell.
I assume the 88 is just as good, maybe even better.
And I played on a PT-86 before, and the tone I could produce on it was fat as hell.
I assume the 88 is just as good, maybe even better.
-
dmeacham5
- bugler

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
*
Last edited by dmeacham5 on Sun Jul 03, 2016 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Tuboss2
- 3 valves

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:11 pm
Re: Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
As in its not as easy to make sound good as other mouthpieces are.
Also it doesn't suit all face shapes. It might or might not fit you. Just gotta play with t and see how it works for you.
Also it doesn't suit all face shapes. It might or might not fit you. Just gotta play with t and see how it works for you.
- WilliamVance
- bugler

- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 1:18 am
- Location: Reno, Nevada
Re: Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
I love my PT-88. I just got one about two months ago and it sounds amazing on all of my Martin tubas and Sousa. It works well with my Miraphone 1291 BBb. I get a great tone on it and had some excellent compliments a few weeks ago on the little solo in Fantasy on a Theme by Sousa at our Veteran's Concert. Notes high and low seem to come easily with this mouthpiece. I have larger lips, but not crazy large... So I love larger mouthpieces. I was playing a Conn Helleberg for about 10 years. I tried a lot of other mouthpieces along the way and the PT-88 is the first one that made me want to change.
Bill Vance
Martin-King 6/4 custom 4V BBb Tuba
Martin "Mammoth" 3V Sousa '27
Martin "Mammoth" 4V Sousa '29
Mirafone 186 BBb (being Oberlohed in Seattle)
Martin-King 6/4 custom 4V BBb Tuba
Martin "Mammoth" 3V Sousa '27
Martin "Mammoth" 4V Sousa '29
Mirafone 186 BBb (being Oberlohed in Seattle)
- GC
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
- Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)
Re: Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
It's definitely a mouthpiece made for larger horns, though I've heard of a few hardy types who use it on Eb.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
-
Maximum_Tuba
- lurker

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:40 am
Re: Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
Thanks Guys, Happy Thanksgiving
-
Tubaleck
- bugler

- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:20 am
Re: Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
Hi i played on a PT 88+ on BBb tuba , great m/p but really big , i also played on it on EEb tuba , huge sound but only drawback was that i had to be n really good practise, or the lips tiered early, was ready for interval on a concert lol
- adam0408
- 3 valves

- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:58 am
- Location: In the back row, playing wrong notes.
Re: Perantucci 88 and 88+ Mouthpiece
I played on a pt 88 for a few years at the urging of my teacher at the time. As far as "feel" goes, it never really blew my skirt up, but it did give me the benefit of having a bigger sound in the low range. The notes down around low F seemed easier to center than on a smaller mouthpiece, and I was told I got a more characteristic tuba sound with it. Playing solo/high range stuff on it produced a sort of "woofy" sound. It isn't a do everything piece, but it is pretty good for orchestral and band literature, if it suits your playing.
Possibly the closest I could get to a technical and objective review would be it provides more fundamental, with less overtone. Think more bass and low midrange, and less treble.
As others have said, it depends on your facial structure and your playing habits (strengths and weaknesses) if this will work for you.
Possibly the closest I could get to a technical and objective review would be it provides more fundamental, with less overtone. Think more bass and low midrange, and less treble.
As others have said, it depends on your facial structure and your playing habits (strengths and weaknesses) if this will work for you.