O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
-
terryomag
- lurker

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 5:07 pm
O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
Can anyone tell me about either the O'Malley or the Schiller compensating euphoniums? I'm not a professional musician, and I'm looking for an inexpensive euphonium. These two brands are selling on eBay for a little more than $1000. But are they junk? Will I be able to get good sound out of them? I'm talking about playing solos at church, not in an orchestra. Any advice would be appreciated.
- Rick F
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:47 pm
- Location: Lake Worth, FL
Re: O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
Hi Terry,
TubeNet is primarily a tuba forum with a few mentions of euphonium. I've never heard of the O'Malley brand and not had personal experience with the Schiller brand, but you might want to search Dave Werden's forum for 'Schiller'. Here's one link to start with:
http://www.dwerden.com/forum/showthread ... post126123
TubeNet is primarily a tuba forum with a few mentions of euphonium. I've never heard of the O'Malley brand and not had personal experience with the Schiller brand, but you might want to search Dave Werden's forum for 'Schiller'. Here's one link to start with:
http://www.dwerden.com/forum/showthread ... post126123
Miraphone 5050 - Warburton BJ/RF mpc
YEP-641S (recently sold), DE mpc (102 rim; I-cup; I-9 shank)
Symphonic Band of the Palm Beaches:
"Always play with a good tone, never louder than lovely, never softer than supported." - author unknown.
YEP-641S (recently sold), DE mpc (102 rim; I-cup; I-9 shank)
Symphonic Band of the Palm Beaches:
"Always play with a good tone, never louder than lovely, never softer than supported." - author unknown.
-
eupher61
- 6 valves

- Posts: 2790
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm
Re: O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
The only problem I have with my Schiller euph is that it doesn't let me play at 442 or 443. At 440 it's perfect. 441 makes me work a bit. Above that nadda chance.
- Wyvern
- Wessex Tubas

- Posts: 5033
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
- Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
- Contact:
Re: O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
That is one of the improvements we have implemented to the Wessex Dolce euphonium. It is made to play at 442, or 440eupher61 wrote:The only problem I have with my Schiller euph is that it doesn't let me play at 442 or 443. At 440 it's perfect. 441 makes me work a bit. Above that nadda chance.
-
terryomag
- lurker

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 5:07 pm
Re: O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
I am an amateur player. What does 440, 441 and 442 mean? 
-
PMeuph
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1382
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:36 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
terryomag wrote:I am an amateur player. What does 440, 441 and 442 mean?
It's the Tuning frequency, It means that A is equal to 440, 441 or 442 HZ. (or Vibrations per second)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A440_(pitch_standard" target="_blank)
Many amateur bands who tune at 440 might end up at 441-442 by the end of a long concert, and I know of quite a few bands who tune a 441 for the extra "brightness" it brings in the sound.
_____
Don't forget to look at the Mack Brass Euphoniums, they're about the same thing as the Schiller, but Tom looks over them.
http://www.mackbrass.com/MACK-EU1150_Comp.php" target="_blank
Yamaha YEP-642s
Boosey & Hawkes 19" Bell Imperial EEb
Boosey & Hawkes 19" Bell Imperial EEb
- Dan Schultz
- TubaTinker

- Posts: 10427
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Newburgh, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
It might be noted that ALL of the percussion instruments produced by Yamaha are tuned to A=442. This seems to be a trend.PMeuph wrote:terryomag wrote:I am an amateur player. What does 440, 441 and 442 mean?
It's the Tuning frequency, It means that A is equal to 440, 441 or 442 HZ. (or Vibrations per second)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A440_(pitch_standard" target="_blank" target="_blank)
Many amateur bands who tune at 440 might end up at 441-442 by the end of a long concert, and I know of quite a few bands who tune a 441 for the extra "brightness" it brings in the sound.
_____
Don't forget to look at the Mack Brass Euphoniums, they're about the same thing as the Schiller, but Tom looks over them.
http://www.mackbrass.com/MACK-EU1150_Comp.php" target="_blank" target="_blank
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
- ghmerrill
- 4 valves

- Posts: 653
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 7:48 am
- Location: Central North Carolina
Re: O'Malley or Schiller Euphoniums
I don't know anything about O'Malley. If you're looking at Schiller, you should look at Mack Brass: http://www.mackbrass.com/MACK-EU1150_Comp.php
Gary Merrill
Wessex EEb tuba (Wick 3XL)
Amati oval euph (DE LN106J6Es)
Mack Brass euph (DE LN106J9)
Buescher 1924 Eb, std rcvr, Kelly 25
Schiller bass trombone (DE LB/J/J9/Lexan 110, Brass Ark MV50R)
Olds '47 Standard trombone (mod. Kelly 12c)
Wessex EEb tuba (Wick 3XL)
Amati oval euph (DE LN106J6Es)
Mack Brass euph (DE LN106J9)
Buescher 1924 Eb, std rcvr, Kelly 25
Schiller bass trombone (DE LB/J/J9/Lexan 110, Brass Ark MV50R)
Olds '47 Standard trombone (mod. Kelly 12c)