B&S 3098 V MRP-C

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
tubajon
bugler
bugler
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 1:31 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

B&S 3098 V MRP-C

Post by tubajon »

Has anyone had the pleasure to compare these two tubas?
User avatar
TubaNerd88
bugler
bugler
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Fort Mitchell, KY, USA

Re: B&S 3098 V MRP-C

Post by TubaNerd88 »

I feel like I could provide some information.

I've owned my MRP-CC for a year and a half now, and having played many copies of the 3098 (PT-6) (which are very consistent from my experience), the biggest difference that I've noticed between the two is sound presence. To me, the MRP-CC plays more like a York-style tuba (probably because of the much bigger/wider bottom bow and bigger bell), so it has a slightly heavier, more rounded and "felt" sound than compared to the 3098 which cuts a little more through the ensemble. The MRP-CC has no problem cutting through the ensemble either, but the 3098 makes that job a little easier. I also feel like the MRP-CC is a little easier to play when compared to the 3098.

If I had a choice between these two horns, I'd go with the MRP-CC every time. For my sound concept, it's exactly what I'm looking for in a contrabass tuba.

If you have any specific questions about these two horns, send me a private message on here. I'd be more than happy to help.
Matthew Gray
Eastman EBC836
Eastman EBF864
User avatar
apsapienza
bugler
bugler
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado

Re: B&S 3098 V MRP-C

Post by apsapienza »

Would love to see others' opinion on this subject. Might be interested in switching from my 6 to a MRP
Angelo Sapienza
Post Reply