crbarnes wrote:If I sent my students down the road to the neighboring band director who was a clarinet player and he sent his tuba players to me, we would both be comfortable charging for those lessons, right?
I don't know about this -- not saying you're wrong, but I'm just not sure. In a public school, is it right for a teacher to require direct payment for course-related instruction? Teaching the skiing (I assume outside of school, sort of like a club) sounds perfectly kosher, but teaching instrumental music seems like the job of the band director.
Not that a band director "should" be giving private lessons to everyone in the band, of course; but I see some possible conflicts of interest. If my son went in after school to ask for extra help from his math teacher, I would expect her to do it without charge, or to refer him to a tutor. Isn't this kind of the same thing? In addition to the fact that students are paying for instrumental music instruction already paid for by the school district, even if you DON'T hold it against the student who doesn't pay for private lessons from you, how can your students KNOW that you won't? And even if you're trying to be fair, wouldn't the student who has lessons with you know better how to do things "your way" better than the student who is taking lessons from an equally qualified teacher who is stressing slightly different objectives?
The handful of band directors I've known of to give private lessons did so on a very limited basis, and did so -- quite openly -- with the express purpose of making the band better. In other words, the squeaky reed got the grease, so to speak. The director was bringing the worst players up so they wouldn't harm the band's sound overall.
All that said, I take you to be an honest, hard-working band director, and pretty much assume that you are underpaid for what you do. Please take my comments as food for thought rather than a rebuke.
___________________________
Joe Baker, who is just asking these questions, not answering them.