Builders, tinkerers - Bore selection

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Peach
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 701
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:42 am
Location: London, UK

Builders, tinkerers - Bore selection

Post by Peach »

I see a lot of F tubas nowadays with 19-22mm bore. Is this becoming rather an industry standard and what is the effect of bore size (both large and small) on a horn, in your experience...
Ta
Peach
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10429
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Builders, tinkerers - Bore selection

Post by Dan Schultz »

Seems to me that the bore size is being driven by the marketing folks who think that's what we want. The truth is that a big bore on a horn that does not have tapers designed for it is pretty useless. It's a matter of the horn being efficient. Remember the days when all makers would do is slap a bigger bell on horns?
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: Builders, tinkerers - Bore selection

Post by Donn »

Are mouthpiece receivers generally the same internal diameter, irrespective of the "bore" measurement at the valves? I wonder if the larger bore is actually because they want a certain taper all the way along the leadpipe, from that fixed starting point?
Post Reply