186: POLL

The bulk of the musical talk

186

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Heliconer
bugler
bugler
Posts: 216
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:30 am

Re: 186: POLL

Post by Heliconer »

I suppose it all boils down to personal preference, but having repaired a few dozen of these, I'm just not impressed by the sound. To me they are like Yamaha tubas; not much variation or character from one to the next.

Although, that does take the guess work out of buying them on eBay :tuba:
A bunch of metal fart noise machines
kathott
bugler
bugler
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:01 am
Location: Canada

Re: 186: POLL

Post by kathott »

Could you amend this poll? It is somewhat incompleat. I am a longtime Mirafone player, but I don't know enough about the various changes made to this model over the years: the later smaller leadpipe, larger bell, venting, the short lived and quite silly "Presto" system, flat whole step 5th valve/right hand operated. To assess these changes, one would have to have several 186's of varying vintage side by side. My own 186 CC (4+1) was made in 1966. It's a workhorse.
Schmenge Kaiser EEb, 3 valve (two rotors, one piston), with a Kosicup mouthpiece (9.2 mm)
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11222
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: 186: POLL

Post by bort »

bloke wrote:There's a 5-valve 1963 model here that - serendipidously - offers as-good-as-current-versions intonation, combined with the handmade 16-1/2" bell sheet metal sound (and like-new condition rotors).
Showoff. :roll: :)
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8556
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: 186: POLL

Post by iiipopes »

I voted for "more change." The old stove pipe bell, to my ears, is too "point-and-shoot" (yes, knowing that a lot of players love that sound). Again, to my ears, the new 17 3/4 bell is too "vanilla" and does not have the best definition (knowing that Miraphone is seeking a broader market). I had the '60's recording bell for awhile. It did not capture the "American tone" that was the goal, and it made everything too front-heavy. I had a retrofit detachable St. Pete bell for awhile. The tone was big and full, leaning towards Alex territory, but again, this is a Miraphone, not an Alex.

As most of you know, my 186 now has a Besson New Standard BBb 17 inch bell. Tone and intonation are great, especially for my application: community concert band. I believe if Miraphone took the taper and bell throat of that bell, which is a slightly different log curve than others, and extended the diameter about an inch to help the terminal node develop for the privileged and pedal tones, it would be a great improvement, along with going back to the smaller bore, different taper of the old leadpipes to bring back out a little more of the even overtones so the tone will knit to the rest of the ensemble better.

But keep the valves - the best rotary valves in the business.
Jupiter JTU1110, RT-82.
"Real" Conn 36K.
User avatar
Rebel
bugler
bugler
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:01 pm

Re: 186: POLL

Post by Rebel »

I have a 1968 186BBb 4 valve. Great horn, and love the quality and craftsmanship of a horn made "in the day".
1990 Yamaha YBB-631 4/4 BBb Compensating Tuba
1995 Yamaha YEP-201 Euphonium
Conn 605 Trombone
Fretted and Fretless 5 String Electric Bass
Voisi1ev
bugler
bugler
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:43 am
Location: Michigan

Re: 186: POLL

Post by Voisi1ev »

http://i.imgur.com/h53RQG8.jpg" target="_blank

Maybe it deserves its own thread, but the school I teach at picked up this horn a couple years back. It came with the recording bell! Makes me want to join a polka band. Plays like a 186...however you take that :P
Tom
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:01 am

Re: 186: POLL

Post by Tom »

Voisi1ev-

The tuba is certainly interesting, but it's the case that really got my attention! I'd actually be interested in seeing more photos of that just out of sheer curiosity.

Another thread would likely be more appropriate so that it doesn't totally take this one off the rails.
The Darling Of The Thirty-Cents-Sharp Low D♭'s.
User avatar
rodgeman
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 406
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: 186: POLL

Post by rodgeman »

Voisi1ev wrote:
Maybe it deserves its own thread, but the school I teach at picked up this horn a couple years back. It came with the recording bell! Makes me want to join a polka band. Plays like a 186...however you take that :P
I have one. It is a 186. My recording bell says Mirafone.
User avatar
roweenie
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 2165
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Waiting on a vintage tow truck

Re: 186: POLL

Post by roweenie »

That case is interesting, but it sort of defeats one of the main advantages of a detachable bell, doesn't it?
"Even a broken clock is right twice a day".
Voisi1ev
bugler
bugler
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:43 am
Location: Michigan

Re: 186: POLL

Post by Voisi1ev »

Both bells are the original Miraphone ones.

We got the horn through a Federal Surplus program, so the case came with it. I assume it was from a NASA band that toured, thus needing a case to withstand a shuttle launch. It is YUUUUGE. Like they don't need to build a wall, just put that thing on the US/Canadian border and no one else is sneaking through. I'd love to sell the case, but not sure there is a market for it. I've put it on the for sale board before.
User avatar
MartyNeilan
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4873
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:06 am
Location: Practicing counting rests.

Re: 186: POLL

Post by MartyNeilan »

the elephant wrote:I like the new ones a lot, but I wish they would release a "classic" version with the exact, same bell used in the late 1960's (with CAD to sniff out any pitch errors that the bell itself might introduce). The new horns are easier to play, but boring, IMHO. So the modern horn from the mouthpiece through the upper bow, and perhaps the old style (and manufacturing techniques) bell and *maybe* the bottom bow.

If having to make a choice between a late 1960s (or early 1970s) era 186-5U CC and the current 186 I would probably opt for the "issues" and go for the sound and feel (and flat 23 5th) of the old horn.
this.
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8556
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: 186: POLL

Post by iiipopes »

Voisi1ev wrote:http://i.imgur.com/h53RQG8.jpg

Maybe it deserves its own thread, but the school I teach at picked up this horn a couple years back. It came with the recording bell! Makes me want to join a polka band. Plays like a 186...however you take that :P
That's what mine used to be before 1) it had the retrofit St Pete bell fitted to it; and 2) I put my Besson 17-inch BBb bell on it to turn it into a "Bessophone."
Jupiter JTU1110, RT-82.
"Real" Conn 36K.
toobagrowl
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: 186: POLL

Post by toobagrowl »

I've only played and worked on one OLD (circa. 1960-ish) Mira. 186 BBb, and liked it better than the modern versions.
To me, it sounded sweeter. Other than the 4TH valve circuit being slightly too short, it played well in tune and had good response.
Post Reply